Skip to main content
Regie.ai logo

Regie.ai Security Assessment

Sales & CRM

Regie.ai is the only Generative AI Platform for enterprise sales teams that personalizes content using data unique to your business and your prospects.

Data: 4/8(50%)
HIGH Friction
SECURITY VERIFIED • SAASPOSTURE • JAN 2026
F
Bottom 20%
Regie.ai logoRegie.ai
SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .
23
Overall Score
Weighted average across all dimensions
F
Security Grade
Critical
65% confidence

Identity & Access Management

F
Score:0
Weight:33%
Grade:F (Critical)

Compliance & Certification

F
Score:0
Weight:19%
Grade:F (Critical)

AI Integration Security

NEW
F
Score:0
Weight:12%
Grade:F (Critical)

API Security

B
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:B (Top 25%)

Infrastructure Security

D
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

Data Protection

F
Score:0
Weight:10%
Grade:F (Critical)

Vulnerability Management

F
Score:0
Weight:3%
Grade:F (Critical)

Breach History

A+
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

A
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A (Top 10%)
🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 16, 2026 at 05:54 AM

Assessment Transparency

See exactly what data backs this security assessment

Data Coverage

4/8 security categories assessed

50%
complete
Identity & Access
Blocked
Compliance
Available
API Security
Available
Infrastructure
Blocked
Data Protection
Missing
Vulnerability Mgmt
Available
Incident Response
Available
Breach History
Missing

Score based on 4 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.

Evaluation Friction

HIGH
Estimated: 4+ weeks
0% public documentation accessibility

Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.

24 data sources successful(2 blocked)
2 Data Sources Blocked

This vendor is actively blocking 2 automated data collection sourcesthrough bot protection, authentication requirements, or access restrictions.

What this means: The security assessment may be incomplete because the vendor is restricting access to public security information. Manual verification may be required during procurement.

Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility

🤖

AI Integration Security

🔒 9th Dimension

Assess whether Regie.ai is safe for AI agent integration. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards.

🔌

AI Readiness

Infrastructure for AI integration

F
35/100
MCP Available
🔌 MCP Server50/100
👨‍💻 Developer Experience0/100
📚 Documentation50/100
Top Recommendation:
⚠️ Official MCP server not found. Best alternative: https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry (Trust: 50/100)
🛡️

AI Security

Safety controls for AI agents

F
4.5/100
HIGH_RISK
🔐 Authentication0%
🔒 Access Control0%
👁️ Observability0%
🔏 Data Privacy15%
✅ Excellent Security:
GDPR Compliance page exists (content not provided)
⚠️ Needs Attention:
No oauth scopes
🛡️Unique Assessment: Evaluating AI agent integration safety helps you make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors

Comprehensive Security Analysis

In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations

Security Analysis

Executive Summary

MetricValueAssessment
Security GradeFNeeds Improvement
Risk LevelHighNot recommended
Enterprise Readiness39%Gaps Exist
Critical Gaps0None

Security Assessment

CategoryScoreStatusAction Required
🟢 Breach History100/100excellentMaintain current controls
🟠 Incident Response60/100needs_improvementMonitor and improve gradually
🟠 API Security50/100needs_improvementAdd rate limiting and authentication
🟠 Infrastructure Security30/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 Identity & Access Management25/100needs_improvementURGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately
🟠 Data Protection20/100needs_improvementImplement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more
🟠 Compliance & Certification0/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 Vulnerability Management0/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls

Overall Grade: F (23/100)

Critical Security Gaps

GapSeverityBusiness ImpactRecommendation
🟡 No public security documentation or audit reportsMEDIUM40-80 hours of security assessment overheadRequest security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper

Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0

Compliance Status

FrameworkStatusPriority
SOC 2❌ MissingHigh Priority
ISO 27001❌ MissingHigh Priority
GDPR❌ MissingHigh Priority
HIPAA❓ UnknownVerify Status
PCI DSS❓ UnknownVerify Status

Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.

Operational Excellence

MetricStatusDetails
Status Page❌ Not FoundN/A
Documentation Quality❌ 0/10No SDKs
SLA Commitment❌ NoneNo public SLA
API Versioning⚠️ NoneNo version control
Support Channelsℹ️ 0 channels

Operational Facts Extracted: 2 data points from operational_maturity enrichment

Integration Requirements

AspectDetailsNotes
Setup Time3-5 days (manual setup required)Estimated deployment timeline
Known IssuesManual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls neededImplementation considerations

⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration

Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:

  • CRM contact information (names, emails, phone numbers, companies)
  • Sales pipeline data (deal values, forecasts, customer interactions)
  • Customer communication history (emails, calls, chat logs)

Risk Level: HIGH - Contains personally identifiable information (PII)

Compliance Requirements:

  • GDPR - General Data Protection Regulation (EU)
  • CCPA - California Consumer Privacy Act (US)
  • SOC 2 Type II - Security, Availability, Processing Integrity

Compliance & Certifications

0
Active
0
Pending
6
Not Certified

AI Integration Security Assessment

Industry-first assessment evaluating whether Regie.ai is safe and ready for AI agent integration. Covers AI security controls and readiness infrastructure for Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP).

AI Integration Security

Industry-first assessment for AI agent safety

F
GRADE
Critical
4.5
AI Security Score
🔐Authentication
0
🛡️Access Control
0
👁️Observability
0
🔒Data Privacy
15
📊Confidence Score
89%
HIGH_RISK

Excellent Security Features

  • GDPR Compliance page exists (content not provided)
  • Multiple enterprise-grade integrations (Salesforce, Outreach, Salesloft) suggest some security standards may exist

⚠️Security Gaps & Recommendations

  • No oauth scopes
  • No token expiration
  • No token rotation
  • No service accounts
  • No mfa enforcement
  • No pii redaction
  • No training opt out
  • No data residency
  • No read only tokens
  • No granular permissions
ℹ️

AI Integration Security evaluates whether Regie.ai is safe for AI agent access. This assessment considers authentication strength, access controls, observability capabilities, and data privacy protections when APIs are accessed by AI systems like Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, or custom AI agents.

AI Readiness Assessment

Evaluates readiness for AI agent integration

F
GRADE
Critical
35.0
AI Readiness Score
🔌
MCP Server Availability(40% weight)

Official or community MCP server support

50
👨‍💻
Developer Experience(30% weight)

API docs, SDKs, code examples

0
📚
Documentation Quality(30% weight)

API reference, auth flows, error handling

50

MCP Server Available

community

Regie.ai supports Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) for secure AI agent integration.

View MCP Server

💡Recommendations

  • ⚠️ Official MCP server not found. Best alternative: https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry (Trust: 50/100)
  • ⚠️ ⚠️ Use with caution - review code before use
  • ❌ Poor AI readiness - not recommended for AI workflows
📊Confidence Score
90%
🕐Last Verified
10/14/2025
ℹ️

AI Readiness measures whether Regie.aiprovides the infrastructure and developer resources necessary for secure AI agent integration. High readiness indicates official MCP server support, comprehensive API documentation, and developer-friendly tools.

API Intelligence

Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Regie.ai.

API Intelligence

Incomplete

API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.

Incomplete API Intelligence

Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.

View Vendor Documentation

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of Regie.ai's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Data Not Yet Assessed

We haven't collected operational maturity data for Regie.ai yet.

🤖

Security Automation APIs

Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Regie.ai

Regie.ai Pricing Overview

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Answer coming soon. Check back later for updates.

Compare with Alternatives

How does Regie.ai stack up against similar applications in Sales & CRM? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application
Score
Grade
AI 🤖
Action
46🏆
C+N/AView
38
D+N/AView
38
D+N/AView
34
DN/AView
30
DN/AView
27
FN/AView
Regie.aiCurrent
23
F4.5
💡

Security Comparison Insight

19 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.