Allego Security Assessment
Sales & CRM
Allego’s learning and enablement platform elevates performance for sales and other teams by combining learning, content, and collaboration into one app, designed for the flow of work.
9-Dimension Security Framework
Identity & Access Management
Compliance & Certification
AI Integration Security
NEWAPI Security
Infrastructure Security
Data Protection
Vulnerability Management
Breach History
Incident Response
AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)
Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.
Last updated: January 16, 2026 at 03:24 AM
Assessment Transparency
See exactly what data backs this security assessment
Data Coverage
6/8 security categories assessed
Score based on 6 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.
Evaluation Friction
Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.
Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility
Comprehensive Security Analysis
In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations
Security Analysis
Executive Summary
| Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Security Grade | D | Needs Improvement |
| Risk Level | High | Not recommended |
| Enterprise Readiness | 42% | Gaps Exist |
| Critical Gaps | 0 | None |
Security Assessment
| Category | Score | Status | Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟢 Breach History | 100/100 | excellent | Maintain current controls |
| 🟡 Vulnerability Management | 85/100 | good | Maintain current controls |
| 🟠 Incident Response | 60/100 | needs_improvement | Monitor and improve gradually |
| 🟠 API Security | 50/100 | needs_improvement | Add rate limiting and authentication |
| 🟠 Infrastructure Security | 50/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
| 🟠 Data Protection | 35/100 | needs_improvement | Implement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more |
| 🟠 Identity & Access Management | 25/100 | needs_improvement | URGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately |
| 🟠 Compliance & Certification | 0/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
Overall Grade: D (30/100)
Critical Security Gaps
| Gap | Severity | Business Impact | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟡 No public security documentation or audit reports | MEDIUM | 40-80 hours of security assessment overhead | Request security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper |
Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0
Compliance Status
| Framework | Status | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| ISO 27001 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| GDPR | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| HIPAA | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
| PCI DSS | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.
Operational Excellence
| Metric | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Status Page | ❌ Not Found | N/A |
| Documentation Quality | ❌ 0/10 | No SDKs |
| SLA Commitment | ❌ None | No public SLA |
| API Versioning | ⚠️ None | No version control |
| Support Channels | ℹ️ 0 channels |
Operational Facts Extracted: 2 data points from operational_maturity enrichment
Integration Requirements
| Aspect | Details | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Time | 3-5 days (manual setup required) | Estimated deployment timeline |
| Known Issues | Manual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls needed | Implementation considerations |
⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration
Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:
- CRM contact information (names, emails, phone numbers, companies)
- Sales pipeline data (deal values, forecasts, customer interactions)
- Customer communication history (emails, calls, chat logs)
Risk Level: HIGH - Contains personally identifiable information (PII)
Compliance Requirements:
- GDPR - General Data Protection Regulation (EU)
- CCPA - California Consumer Privacy Act (US)
- SOC 2 Type II - Security, Availability, Processing Integrity
Compliance & Certifications
API Intelligence
Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Allego.
API Intelligence
API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.
Incomplete API Intelligence
Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.
View Vendor DocumentationAI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis
LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.
CISO
This platform shows mixed security maturity with notable gaps in critical areas. While Allego demonstrates some authentication capabilities, the incomplete security assessment raises significant concerns about their commitment to comprehensive security controls.
Key Security Findings:
The most concerning issue is the limited visibility into fundamental security domains. Authentication controls score 43/100, indicating basic identity management capabilities but falling short of enterprise standards for multi-factor authentication, session management, and privileged access controls. This moderate score suggests authentication mechanisms exist but may lack the sophistication required for enterprise-scale deployments.
The complete absence of data across encryption, compliance, infrastructure security, and application security domains presents a critical evaluation challenge. Without visibility into data protection standards, network security controls, or vulnerability management practices, it's impossible to assess whether basic security hygiene exists. This data gap itself indicates potential security program immaturity, as mature vendors typically maintain comprehensive security documentation and undergo regular third-party assessments.
The lack of industry certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001) is particularly concerning for enterprise procurement. These frameworks provide independent validation of security controls and are standard requirements for vendor risk management programs. Additionally, no compliance framework alignment (GDPR, HIPAA) limits deployment options for regulated industries.
While no breach history exists, this alone cannot compensate for the structural security gaps identified. The overall security posture suggests an organization that may prioritize feature development over security infrastructure investment.
CISO Recommendation:
Conditional approval requiring significant compensating controls. Implement additional monitoring, data loss prevention tools, and network segmentation before production deployment. Require vendor completion of comprehensive security assessment and obtain SOC 2 Type II certification within 12 months. Consider this platform only for non-critical workloads with enhanced oversight.
Security Posture & Operational Capabilities
Comprehensive assessment of Allego's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.
Operational Data Not Yet Assessed
We haven't collected operational maturity data for Allego yet.
Security Automation APIs
Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Allego
Allego's security posture reveals significant vulnerabilities with an overall security score of 19/100, earning a concerning F grade. The comprehensive security assessment highlights critical weaknesses across multiple dimensions. Identity and Access Management scores just 29/100, while Compliance and Certification and API Security both register at 0, indicating substantial security gaps. Infrastructure Security performs marginally better at 35/100, with Vulnerability Management reaching 68/100. The platform's sole bright spot is its Breach History score of 80/100.
Security decision-makers should carefully evaluate these findings, particularly the zero scores in critical areas like Compliance and API Security. These results suggest an urgent need for comprehensive security improvements. Stakeholders can find a detailed breakdown of Allego's security dimensions in the Security Framework section, which provides granular insights into each assessed category. For enterprise risk management, this low score warrants immediate security review and potential mitigation strategies.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Allego receives a critical security assessment with an overall score of 19/100, signaling substantial security improvements needed across multiple dimensions. The platform demonstrates minimal security capabilities, with most dimensions scoring below 35/100. Identity & Access Management represents the strongest area at 29/100, while Infrastructure Security registers 35/100. Vulnerability Management shows a comparatively better performance at 68/100, and Breach History remains the sole "strong" category with an 80/100 score. Critical security areas like Compliance & Certification, API Security, and Data Protection are currently scoring 0/100, indicating significant potential risks. Organizations considering Allego should conduct extensive security due diligence, particularly around data protection mechanisms, API security protocols, and compliance frameworks. See Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of Allego's security posture and potential mitigation strategies.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Allego's security posture presents significant concerns for financial data management, with an overall security score of just 19/100 and an "F" grade. Critical security dimensions reveal substantial vulnerabilities: identity and access management scores only 29/100, while compliance and API security both register 0/100. Infrastructure security marginally performs at 35/100, with data protection scoring zero. The platform's vulnerability management reaches 68/100, and its breach history demonstrates a relatively strong 80/100 score.
Financial teams considering Allego should conduct thorough due diligence. The low scores across fundamental security dimensions suggest potential risks in protecting sensitive financial information. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of each security category. For organizations handling confidential financial data, we recommend an extensive security review and potentially exploring alternative platforms with more robust security controls.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Allego demonstrates significant security infrastructure challenges with an overall security score of 19/100, resulting in an "F" grade. Critical security dimensions reveal substantial gaps across multiple domains. The platform's Infrastructure Security scores a mere 35/100, indicating considerable vulnerability. Identity and Access Management performs marginally better at 29/100, suggesting minimal access control protections. While Vulnerability Management shows a relatively stronger score of 68/100, Compliance and API Security are critically low, registering zero points.
Security professionals should carefully evaluate Allego's readiness for enterprise deployment. The platform's low scores across Identity Management, API Security, and Compliance suggest potential risk exposure. The sole bright spot is a strong Breach History score of 80/100, indicating limited historical security incidents.
For comprehensive security insights, review the Security Dimensions section on SaaSPosture.com, which provides detailed risk assessments across critical infrastructure domains.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Allego's security profile presents significant enterprise risk with a critically low security score of 19/100, rendering the platform unsuitable for organizations prioritizing data protection and compliance. The platform fails to meet fundamental enterprise security standards, lacking critical certifications including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS compliance. These substantial compliance gaps expose organizations to potential data breaches, regulatory violations, and substantial operational vulnerabilities. Security decision-makers should exercise extreme caution and conduct comprehensive vendor security assessments before considering Allego for any sensitive business processes. The platform's F-grade security rating indicates systemic security weaknesses that could compromise organizational data integrity, confidentiality, and regulatory adherence. For enterprise-grade learning and development platforms, organizations should seek vendors demonstrating robust security frameworks, comprehensive compliance certifications, and transparent security practices. See the Security Dimensions section for a detailed breakdown of specific security shortcomings.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Compare with Alternatives
How does Allego stack up against similar applications in Sales & CRM? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.
| Application | Overall ScoreScore↓ | Grade | AI Security 🤖AI 🤖⇅ | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
46/100🏆 | C+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
42/100 | C | N/A | View ProfileView | |
38/100 | D+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
38/100 | D+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
34/100 | D | N/A | View ProfileView | |
AllegoCurrent | 30/100 | D | N/A | |
27/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView |
Security Comparison Insight
12 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.