Skip to main content
Tidio logo

Tidio Security Assessment

Communication & Collaboration

Tidio is an all-in-one AI customer support platform that includes help desk issue tracking, live chat, chatbot automation (Flows), and an AI customer service agent (Lyro). The platform allows businesses to manage all customer communication from a single dashboard, including email and social media channels like WhatsApp, Messenger, and Instagram. Tidio’s interactive widget functions as both a live chat plugin and a chatbot. With Flows, businesses can create custom chatbot-like automations to automatically provide answers to incoming messages, offer support, and generate leads. Additionally, Lyro uses your knowledge base and FAQs to provide accurate, helpful, and natural answers and solutions in your brand’s unique tone of voice. Lyro can achieve up to a 64% resolution rate, allowing your team to focus on more complex issues.

Data: 4/8(50%)
SECURITY VERIFIED • SAASPOSTURE • JAN 2026
F
Bottom 20%
Tidio logoTidio
SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .
21
Overall Score
Weighted average across all dimensions
F
Security Grade
Critical
65% confidence

Identity & Access Management

F
Score:0
Weight:33%
Grade:F (Critical)

Compliance & Certification

F
Score:0
Weight:19%
Grade:F (Critical)

AI Integration Security

NEW
N/A
Score:0
Weight:12%
Grade:N/A

API Security

D
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

Infrastructure Security

F
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:F (Critical)

Data Protection

F
Score:0
Weight:10%
Grade:F (Critical)

Vulnerability Management

A+
Score:0
Weight:3%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Breach History

A+
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

F
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:F (Critical)
🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 08:46 AM

Assessment Transparency

See exactly what data backs this security assessment

Data Coverage

4/8 security categories assessed

50%
complete
Identity & Access
Available
Compliance
Missing
API Security
Available
Infrastructure
Available
Data Protection
Missing
Vulnerability Mgmt
Available
Incident Response
Missing
Breach History
Missing

Score based on 4 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.

Evaluation Friction

UNKNOWN
Estimated: Unknown
0% public documentation accessibility

Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.

15 data sources successful

Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility

Comprehensive Security Analysis

In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations

Security Analysis

Executive Summary

MetricValueAssessment
Security GradeFNeeds Improvement
Risk LevelHighNot recommended
Enterprise Readiness38%Gaps Exist
Critical Gaps0None

Security Assessment

CategoryScoreStatusAction Required
🟢 Breach History100/100excellentMaintain current controls
🟡 Vulnerability Management85/100goodMaintain current controls
🟠 API Security30/100needs_improvementAdd rate limiting and authentication
🟠 Identity & Access Management25/100needs_improvementURGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately
🟠 Infrastructure Security20/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 Data Protection20/100needs_improvementImplement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more
🟠 Compliance & Certification0/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 Incident Response0/100needs_improvementDocument incident response plan

Overall Grade: F (21/100)

Critical Security Gaps

GapSeverityBusiness ImpactRecommendation
🟡 No public security documentation or audit reportsMEDIUM40-80 hours of security assessment overheadRequest security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper

Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0

Compliance Status

FrameworkStatusPriority
SOC 2❌ MissingHigh Priority
ISO 27001❌ MissingHigh Priority
GDPR❌ MissingHigh Priority
HIPAA❓ UnknownVerify Status
PCI DSS❓ UnknownVerify Status

Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.

Operational Excellence

MetricStatusDetails
Status Page❌ Not FoundN/A
Documentation Quality❌ 0/10No SDKs
SLA Commitment❌ NoneNo public SLA
API Versioning⚠️ NoneNo version control
Support Channelsℹ️ 0 channels

Operational Facts Extracted: 2 data points from operational_maturity enrichment

Integration Requirements

AspectDetailsNotes
Setup Time3-5 days (manual setup required)Estimated deployment timeline
Known IssuesManual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls neededImplementation considerations

⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration

Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:

  • Business email communications
  • Internal collaboration content
  • Customer support conversations

Risk Level: HIGH - Contains personally identifiable information (PII)

Compliance Requirements:

  • GDPR - General Data Protection Regulation (EU)
  • CCPA - California Consumer Privacy Act (US)

Compliance & Certifications

0
Active
0
Pending
6
Not Certified

API Intelligence

Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Tidio.

API Intelligence

Incomplete

API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.

Incomplete API Intelligence

Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.

View Vendor Documentation

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

CISO

Tidio presents extreme security vulnerabilities that disqualify the platform from enterprise consideration. With an alarming overall security score of 21/100 and an F grade, this vendor represents a critical security risk requiring immediate rejection.

Key Security Findings reveal comprehensive systemic deficiencies across every security dimension. Most critically, zero scores exist in fundamental security domains including identity access, encryption, data protection, and compliance frameworks. The complete absence of standard enterprise security certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR compliance) signals profound security immaturity. No evidence exists of breach intelligence monitoring, infrastructure security controls, or threat management capabilities.

The AI integration security landscape is equally concerning, registering a 0/100 AI readiness score. While the platform technically possesses API documentation, the absence of meaningful security controls renders this irrelevant. The lack of documented breach history does not inspire confidence, but rather suggests potential underreporting or minimal security tracking.

CISO Recommendation: Unequivocally reject Tidio for any production or sensitive workload deployment. The security posture is fundamentally incompatible with enterprise risk management standards. Any consideration would require a comprehensive security transformation, including:

  • Implementing multi-factor authentication
  • Developing robust encryption protocols
  • Establishing comprehensive compliance frameworks
  • Creating thorough vendor risk management processes

Immediate disqualification is the only prudent path forward given the extreme security vulnerabilities present.

AI-Powered Analysis
Claude Sonnet 4448 wordsZero fabrication

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of Tidio's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Data Not Yet Assessed

We haven't collected operational maturity data for Tidio yet.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Tidio

Tidio's security posture reveals significant vulnerabilities with an overall security score of 21/100, resulting in an F grade. The assessment exposes critical weaknesses across multiple security dimensions. Infrastructure Security shows a moderate score of 54, while Vulnerability Management reaches 68, providing minimal protection. Identity & Access Management scores 29, indicating substantial access control risks. Most concerning are complete score failures in Compliance & Certification, API Security, Data Protection, and Incident Response. The only bright spot is Breach History, scoring 80, suggesting limited historical security incidents. Security decision-makers should exercise extreme caution when considering Tidio's platform, as its low security score suggests significant potential risks to organizational data and systems. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of these critical security assessment metrics.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Tidio's security assessment reveals critical vulnerabilities across multiple dimensions. With an overall security score of 21/100, the platform receives an F grade, signaling substantial security improvements are necessary. Infrastructure Security shows modest performance at 54/100, while Vulnerability Management achieves 68/100. Notably, Breach History represents a rare bright spot with an 80/100 score. However, significant gaps exist in crucial security areas: Compliance & Certification, API Security, and Data Protection each score 0/100, indicating fundamental security framework deficiencies. Identity & Access Management performs marginally better at 29/100, still categorized as "needs improvement". The security framework lacks robust encryption and comprehensive authentication mechanisms. Security decision-makers should conduct thorough due diligence and request detailed security documentation directly from Tidio. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of Tidio's security posture.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Tidio presents significant security risks for handling financial data, with an overall security score of 21/100 and an F grade. Critical vulnerabilities exist across multiple security dimensions, including complete absence of compliance certifications, API security, and data protection measures. While infrastructure security scores 54/100 and vulnerability management reaches 68/100, these isolated strengths cannot compensate for fundamental security gaps. The platform's Identity & Access Management dimension scores only 29/100, indicating substantial weaknesses in access control and user authentication. Most concerning is the zero score in compliance and API security, which are crucial for financial data protection. Financial teams and compliance officers should exercise extreme caution and conduct thorough independent security assessments before considering Tidio for sensitive transactional environments. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of Tidio's security profile.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Tidio's infrastructure security presents significant concerns with an overall security score of just 21/100, resulting in an F grade. The platform demonstrates minimal security capabilities across critical dimensions. Infrastructure security achieves a modest 54/100, while vulnerability management scores slightly better at 68/100. However, critical areas like compliance, API security, and data protection are rated at 0, indicating substantial security gaps. The lone bright spot is a strong 80/100 breach history score, suggesting limited past security incidents. Identity and access management remains weak at 29/100, presenting potential unauthorized access risks. Decision-makers should exercise extreme caution, as Tidio lacks fundamental security controls across compliance, API protection, and data safeguarding. For comprehensive security insights, refer to the Security Dimensions section on the SaaSPosture.com app page, which provides a granular breakdown of Tidio's infrastructure vulnerabilities.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Tidio presents significant security risks that would make enterprise-level approval challenging. With an overall security score of just 21/100 and an "F" grade, the platform lacks critical enterprise security standards. The application shows multiple compliance gaps across key frameworks including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS - certifications essential for protecting sensitive organizational data.

Security decision-makers should exercise extreme caution and conduct a comprehensive risk assessment before considering Tidio for any enterprise environment. The low scoring security profile suggests potential vulnerabilities that could expose an organization to data breaches, regulatory non-compliance, and operational risks.

For a comprehensive security analysis, consult the Security Dimensions section on this page, which provides a detailed breakdown of Tidio's security assessment across multiple risk categories. Comprehensive vendor due diligence is strongly recommended.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Compare with Alternatives

How does Tidio stack up against similar applications in Communication & Collaboration? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application
Score
Grade
AI 🤖
Action
56🏆
B+N/AView
52
BN/AView
49
C+N/AView
36
D+N/AView
34
DN/AView
22
FN/AView
TidioCurrent
21
FN/A
💡

Security Comparison Insight

19 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.