SafeBase Security Assessment
Security & Compliance
SafeBase is a Trust Center platform designed to streamline security reviews and enhance transparency between businesses and their clients. By automating the sharing of security, compliance, and privacy information, SafeBase helps organizations build trust, reduce the time spent on security questionnaires, and accelerate sales cycles. Its AI-powered Questionnaire Assistance and robust integrations with tools like Salesforce and Slack enable security and sales teams to efficiently manage and communicate their security posture. Key Features and Functionality: - Branded Trust Center: A centralized hub to host security reports, documents, and policies, allowing clients to self-serve information and reducing the need for repetitive inquiries. - AI Questionnaire Assistance: Utilizes artificial intelligence to rapidly process and respond to complex security questionnaires, significantly decreasing manual effort and response time. - Integrations: Seamlessly connects with workplace productivity tools and CRMs, including Slack, Teams, Salesforce, and HubSpot, to embed security reviews into existing workflows. - Analytics: Provides comprehensive insights into security-influenced revenue and buyer engagement metrics, enabling organizations to measure the impact of their security programs. Primary Value and Solutions: SafeBase addresses the common challenge of time-consuming and resource-intensive security reviews by offering a platform that automates and simplifies these processes. By providing a transparent and accessible Trust Center, organizations can proactively share their security posture, reducing the volume of security questionnaires and building customer trust. The AI-powered Questionnaire Assistance further diminishes the burden of responding to security assessments, allowing teams to focus on strategic initiatives. Overall, SafeBase enhances efficiency, accelerates sales cycles, and positions security as a business enabler.
9-Dimension Security Framework
Identity & Access Management
Compliance & Certification
AI Integration Security
NEWAPI Security
Infrastructure Security
Data Protection
Vulnerability Management
Breach History
Incident Response
AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)
Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.
Last updated: January 9, 2026 at 12:33 PM
AI Integration Security
🔒 9th DimensionAssess whether SafeBase is safe for AI agent integration. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards.
AI Readiness
Infrastructure for AI integration
AI Security
Safety controls for AI agents
Comprehensive Security Analysis
In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations
Security Analysis
Executive Summary
| Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Security Grade | D | Needs Improvement |
| Risk Level | High | Not recommended |
| Enterprise Readiness | 43% | Gaps Exist |
| Critical Gaps | 1 | Immediate attention |
Security Assessment
| Category | Score | Status | Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟢 Breach History | 100/100 | excellent | Maintain current controls |
| 🟡 Vulnerability Management | 85/100 | good | Maintain current controls |
| 🟠 Incident Response | 60/100 | needs_improvement | Monitor and improve gradually |
| 🟠 API Security | 50/100 | needs_improvement | Add rate limiting and authentication |
| 🟠 Identity & Access Management | 40/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
| 🟠 Infrastructure Security | 30/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
| 🟠 Data Protection | 30/100 | needs_improvement | Implement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more |
| 🟠 Compliance & Certification | 0/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
Overall Grade: D (33/100)
Critical Security Gaps
| Gap | Severity | Business Impact | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔴 Data Protection score: 30/100 | CRITICAL | High risk of data breach or unauthorized access | Implement data encryption audit before deployment |
| 🟡 No public security documentation or audit reports | MEDIUM | 40-80 hours of security assessment overhead | Request security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper |
Total Gaps Identified: 2 | Critical/High Priority: 1
Compliance Status
| Framework | Status | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| ISO 27001 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| GDPR | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| HIPAA | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
| PCI DSS | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.
Operational Excellence
| Metric | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Status Page | ❌ Not Found | N/A |
| Documentation Quality | ❌ 0/10 | No SDKs |
| SLA Commitment | ❌ None | No public SLA |
| API Versioning | ⚠️ None | No version control |
| Support Channels | ℹ️ 0 channels |
Operational Facts Extracted: 2 data points from operational_maturity enrichment
Infrastructure Security
| Infrastructure Metric | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| VirusTotal Reputation | ✅ 100/100 | 95 security engines scanned |
| SSL/TLS Certificate | ✅ Valid | Issued by Unknown |
| Certificate Expiry | ℹ️ Unknown | Regular renewal required |
| Domain Age | ⚠️ 4 years | Newer vendor |
Infrastructure Facts Extracted: 4 data points from virustotal_intelligence
Integration Requirements
| Aspect | Details | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Time | 3-5 days (manual setup required) | Estimated deployment timeline |
| Known Issues | Manual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls needed | Implementation considerations |
Authentication Capabilities
| Method | Tier Requirement | Evidence Source |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ SSO (SAML/OAuth) | Enterprise | sso_discovery (90% confidence) |
Authentication Facts Extracted: 0 data points from auth_evidence enrichment
⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration
Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:
Risk Level: LOW - Contains
Compliance & Certifications
AI Integration Security Assessment
Industry-first assessment evaluating whether SafeBase is safe and ready for AI agent integration. Covers AI security controls and readiness infrastructure for Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP).
AI Integration Security
Industry-first assessment for AI agent safety
✅Excellent Security Features
- ●Platform focuses on security transparency and trust documentation
- ●Access request approval workflow suggests some access control mechanisms exist
- ●Partnership with DataGrail indicates privacy awareness
⚠️Security Gaps & Recommendations
- ●No oauth scopes
- ●No token expiration
- ●No token rotation
- ●No service accounts
- ●No mfa enforcement
- ●No pii redaction
- ●No training opt out
- ●No data residency
- ●No read only tokens
- ●No action restrictions
AI Integration Security evaluates whether SafeBase is safe for AI agent access. This assessment considers authentication strength, access controls, observability capabilities, and data privacy protections when APIs are accessed by AI systems like Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, or custom AI agents.
AI Readiness Assessment
Evaluates readiness for AI agent integration
Official or community MCP server support
API docs, SDKs, code examples
API reference, auth flows, error handling
MCP Server Available
SafeBase supports Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) for secure AI agent integration.
💡Recommendations
- →❌ Poor AI readiness - not recommended for AI workflows
AI Readiness measures whether SafeBaseprovides the infrastructure and developer resources necessary for secure AI agent integration. High readiness indicates official MCP server support, comprehensive API documentation, and developer-friendly tools.
API Intelligence
Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for SafeBase.
API Intelligence
No public API documentation found. This vendor may not offer a public API.
No API Found
We didn't find public API documentation for this vendor. Many SaaS vendors, especially SMB-focused tools, don't offer public REST APIs. This is normal and not a data quality issue.
Note: Not all SaaS vendors offer public APIs. This is completely normal, especially for SMB-focused tools. It doesn't affect the security assessment.
AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis
LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.
Security Posture & Operational Capabilities
Comprehensive assessment of SafeBase's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.
Operational Data Not Yet Assessed
We haven't collected operational maturity data for SafeBase yet.
Authentication Data Not Yet Assessed
We haven't collected authentication and authorization data for SafeBase yet.
Security Automation APIs
Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls
API Documentation
View complete API reference for SafeBase
Data confidence: 60% • Assessed from API documentation and developer portal analysis
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about SafeBase
Manage Trust Center tasks with integrations for Slack, Teams and Jira, streamline DocuSign and Ironclad NDA workflows, and embed Intercom chat tools within your Trust Center. Plus integrate into major
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
SafeBase combines an enterprise-grade Trust Center with powerful AI to accelerate security questionnaire workflows, reduce manual effort, and deliver the trust signals your buyers need — fast. Use AI
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Compare with Alternatives
How does SafeBase stack up against similar applications in Security & Compliance? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.
| Application | Overall ScoreScore↓ | Grade | AI Security 🤖AI 🤖⇅ | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
44/100🏆 | C | N/A | View ProfileView | |
43/100 | C | N/A | View ProfileView | |
35/100 | D+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
SafeBaseCurrent | 33/100 | D | 26.2/100 | |
30/100 | D | N/A | View ProfileView | |
25/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
23/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView |
Security Comparison Insight
8 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.