Skip to main content
Axiom Protect logo

Axiom Protect Security Assessment

Security & Compliance

Axiom Protect is a comprehensive Identity and Access Management platform designed for high-security environments. It offers secure user onboarding, advanced multi-factor authentication , AI-driven risk analytics, and a centralized trust gateway. The platform is engineered to reduce operational overhead while ensuring compliance, providing adaptive and intelligent protection with seamless user experiences and enterprise-grade access control. Key Features and Functionality: - Secure User Onboarding: Streamlines the process of adding new users while maintaining high-security standards. - Advanced Multi-Factor Authentication : Enhances security by requiring multiple forms of verification. - AI-Driven Risk Analytics: Utilizes artificial intelligence to assess and mitigate potential security risks. - Centralized Trust Gateway: Provides a unified point of control for managing access and trust relationships. Primary Value and User Solutions: Axiom Protect addresses the critical need for robust identity security in high-risk environments. By integrating secure onboarding, advanced authentication, and intelligent risk analysis, it minimizes operational complexities and ensures compliance. Users benefit from a seamless experience that combines stringent security measures with efficient access management, ultimately safeguarding sensitive information and resources.

SECURITY VERIFIED • SAASPOSTURE • JAN 2026
F
Bottom 20%
Axiom Protect logoAxiom Protect
SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .
23
Overall Score
Weighted average across all dimensions
F
Security Grade
Critical
65% confidence

Identity & Access Management

F
Score:0
Weight:33%
Grade:F (Critical)

Compliance & Certification

F
Score:0
Weight:19%
Grade:F (Critical)

AI Integration Security

NEW
N/A
Score:0
Weight:12%
Grade:N/A

API Security

D
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

Infrastructure Security

D
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

Data Protection

F
Score:0
Weight:10%
Grade:F (Critical)

Vulnerability Management

A+
Score:0
Weight:3%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Breach History

A+
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

A
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A (Top 10%)
🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 9, 2026 at 01:17 PM

Comprehensive Security Analysis

In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations

Security Analysis

Executive Summary

MetricValueAssessment
Security GradeFNeeds Improvement
Risk LevelHighNot recommended
Enterprise Readiness39%Gaps Exist
Critical Gaps1Immediate attention

Security Assessment

CategoryScoreStatusAction Required
🟢 Breach History100/100excellentMaintain current controls
🟡 Vulnerability Management85/100goodMaintain current controls
🟠 Incident Response60/100needs_improvementMonitor and improve gradually
🟠 API Security30/100needs_improvementAdd rate limiting and authentication
🟠 Infrastructure Security30/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 Identity & Access Management25/100needs_improvementURGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately
🟠 Data Protection20/100needs_improvementImplement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more
🟠 Compliance & Certification0/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls

Overall Grade: F (23/100)

Critical Security Gaps

GapSeverityBusiness ImpactRecommendation
🔴 Data Protection score: 20/100CRITICALHigh risk of data breach or unauthorized accessImplement data encryption audit before deployment
🟡 No public security documentation or audit reportsMEDIUM40-80 hours of security assessment overheadRequest security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper

Total Gaps Identified: 2 | Critical/High Priority: 1

Compliance Status

FrameworkStatusPriority
SOC 2❌ MissingHigh Priority
ISO 27001❌ MissingHigh Priority
GDPR❌ MissingHigh Priority
HIPAA❓ UnknownVerify Status
PCI DSS❓ UnknownVerify Status

Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.

Operational Excellence

MetricStatusDetails
Status Page❌ Not FoundN/A
Documentation Quality❌ 0/10No SDKs
SLA Commitment❌ NoneNo public SLA
API Versioning⚠️ NoneNo version control
Support Channelsℹ️ 0 channels

Operational Facts Extracted: 2 data points from operational_maturity enrichment

Infrastructure Security

Infrastructure MetricStatusDetails
VirusTotal Reputation✅ 100/10095 security engines scanned
SSL/TLS Certificate✅ ValidIssued by Unknown
Certificate Expiryℹ️ UnknownRegular renewal required
Domain Age⚠️ 5 yearsNewer vendor

Infrastructure Facts Extracted: 4 data points from virustotal_intelligence

Integration Requirements

AspectDetailsNotes
Setup Time3-5 days (manual setup required)Estimated deployment timeline
Known IssuesManual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls neededImplementation considerations

Authentication Capabilities

MethodTier RequirementEvidence Source
❌ OAuth 2.0All Tiersauth_discovery (90% confidence)
✅ SSO (SAML/OAuth)Enterprisesso_discovery (90% confidence)

Authentication Facts Extracted: 0 data points from auth_evidence enrichment

⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration

Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:

Risk Level: LOW - Contains

Compliance & Certifications

0
Active
0
Pending
6
Not Certified

API Intelligence

Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Axiom Protect.

API Intelligence

No API Found

No public API documentation found. This vendor may not offer a public API.

No API Found

We didn't find public API documentation for this vendor. Many SaaS vendors, especially SMB-focused tools, don't offer public REST APIs. This is normal and not a data quality issue.

Note: Not all SaaS vendors offer public APIs. This is completely normal, especially for SMB-focused tools. It doesn't affect the security assessment.

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of Axiom Protect's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Data Not Yet Assessed

We haven't collected operational maturity data for Axiom Protect yet.

🔐

Authentication Data Not Yet Assessed

We haven't collected authentication and authorization data for Axiom Protect yet.

🤖

Security Automation APIs

Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls

Data confidence: 80% • Assessed from API documentation and developer portal analysis

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Axiom Protect

Axiom's encryption practices align with industry standards and are regularly audited to ensure the highest level of security. Data is stored in the Amazon Web Services (AWS) infrastructure at rest and

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Compare with Alternatives

How does Axiom Protect stack up against similar applications in Security & Compliance? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application
Score
Grade
AI 🤖
Action
44🏆
CN/AView
43
CN/AView
35
D+N/AView
30
DN/AView
25
FN/AView
23
FN/A
23
FN/AView
💡

Security Comparison Insight

19 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.