Riskprofiler Security Assessment
Security & Compliance
RiskProfiler offers a comprehensive suite of products for Continuous Threat Exposure Management, addressing an organization's external attack surface. These include the Cyber RiskProfiler for cyber risk ratings, Recon RiskProfiler for EASM capabilities, Cloud RiskProfiler for identifying and prioritizing externally exposed cloud assets, and Brand RiskProfiler for brand protection. Recon RiskProfiler is an advanced EASM and CASM solution with robust integrations across major cloud providers like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. It delivers comprehensive visibility into external cloud resources, enabling efficient identification, assessment, and management of vulnerabilities and risks. Vendor RiskProfiler is a comprehensive Cyber Risk and Vendor Risk Management solution that delivers company cyber risk ratings while enabling efficient sending, receiving, and validation of third-party vendor security questionnaires in near real-time, facilitating seamless risk assessment and communication. Brand RiskProfiler is a comprehensive brand protection solution that detects logo abuse, monitors passive phishing, identifies typosquats, enables domain takedowns, and uncovers fake apps, safeguarding organizations' digital reputation and customer trust. Cloud RiskProfiler employs advanced based on context based enriched graph data models to pinpoint and rank actually exposed external-facing assets in the cloud. Evaluating risks through a hacker's lens, it alerts on high-risk assets, fortifying the external cloud attack surface.
9-Dimension Security Framework
Identity & Access Management
API Security
AI Integration Security
NEWInfrastructure Security
Data Protection
Vulnerability Management
Breach History
Incident Response
AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)
Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.
Last updated: January 9, 2026 at 12:33 PM
Comprehensive Security Analysis
In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations
Security Analysis
Executive Summary
| Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Security Grade | D+ | Needs Improvement |
| Risk Level | High | Not recommended |
| Enterprise Readiness | 44% | Gaps Exist |
| Critical Gaps | 1 | Immediate attention |
Security Assessment
| Category | Score | Status | Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟢 Breach History | 100/100 | excellent | Maintain current controls |
| 🟡 Vulnerability Management | 85/100 | good | Maintain current controls |
| 🟠 Incident Response | 60/100 | needs_improvement | Monitor and improve gradually |
| 🟠 Infrastructure Security | 50/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
| 🟠 API Security | 30/100 | needs_improvement | Add rate limiting and authentication |
| 🟠 Data Protection | 30/100 | needs_improvement | Implement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more |
| 🟠 Identity & Access Management | 25/100 | needs_improvement | URGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately |
Overall Grade: D+ (35/100)
Critical Security Gaps
| Gap | Severity | Business Impact | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔴 Data Protection score: 30/100 | CRITICAL | High risk of data breach or unauthorized access | Implement data encryption audit before deployment |
| 🟡 No public security documentation or audit reports | MEDIUM | 40-80 hours of security assessment overhead | Request security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper |
Total Gaps Identified: 2 | Critical/High Priority: 1
Compliance Status
| Framework | Status | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| ISO 27001 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| GDPR | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| HIPAA | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
| PCI DSS | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.
Operational Excellence
| Metric | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Status Page | ❌ Not Found | N/A |
| Documentation Quality | ❌ 0/10 | No SDKs |
| SLA Commitment | ❌ None | No public SLA |
| API Versioning | ⚠️ None | No version control |
| Support Channels | ℹ️ 0 channels |
Operational Facts Extracted: 2 data points from operational_maturity enrichment
Infrastructure Security
| Infrastructure Metric | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| VirusTotal Reputation | ✅ 100/100 | 95 security engines scanned |
| SSL/TLS Certificate | ✅ Valid | Issued by Unknown |
| Certificate Expiry | ℹ️ Unknown | Regular renewal required |
| Domain Age | ⚠️ 5 years | Newer vendor |
Infrastructure Facts Extracted: 4 data points from virustotal_intelligence
Integration Requirements
| Aspect | Details | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Time | 3-5 days (manual setup required) | Estimated deployment timeline |
| Known Issues | Manual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls needed | Implementation considerations |
⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration
Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:
Risk Level: LOW - Contains
Compliance & Certifications
API Intelligence
Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Riskprofiler.
API Intelligence
No public API documentation found. This vendor may not offer a public API.
No API Found
We didn't find public API documentation for this vendor. Many SaaS vendors, especially SMB-focused tools, don't offer public REST APIs. This is normal and not a data quality issue.
Note: Not all SaaS vendors offer public APIs. This is completely normal, especially for SMB-focused tools. It doesn't affect the security assessment.
AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis
LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.
Security Posture & Operational Capabilities
Comprehensive assessment of Riskprofiler's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.
Operational Data Not Yet Assessed
We haven't collected operational maturity data for Riskprofiler yet.
Security Automation APIs
Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls
API Documentation
View complete API reference for Riskprofiler
Data confidence: 60% • Assessed from API documentation and developer portal analysis
Compare with Alternatives
How does Riskprofiler stack up against similar applications in Security & Compliance? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.
| Application | Overall ScoreScore↓ | Grade | AI Security 🤖AI 🤖⇅ | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
44/100🏆 | C | N/A | View ProfileView | |
43/100 | C | N/A | View ProfileView | |
RiskprofilerCurrent | 35/100 | D+ | N/A | |
35/100 | D+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
30/100 | D | N/A | View ProfileView | |
25/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
23/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView |
Security Comparison Insight
7 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.