Qgiv Security Assessment
Vertical Industry Solutions
Qgiv is an online fundraising and giving solution with mobile fundraising capabilities. Qgiv exists to help nonprofit organizations raise more money with a comprehensive suite of fundraising tools featuring customizable donation forms, event registration, peer-to-peer fundraising, text giving with outbound messaging, and auction events.
9-Dimension Security Framework
Identity & Access Management
Compliance & Certification
AI Integration Security
NEWAPI Security
Infrastructure Security
Data Protection
Vulnerability Management
Breach History
Incident Response
AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)
Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.
Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 07:47 PM
Assessment Transparency
See exactly what data backs this security assessment
Data Coverage
4/8 security categories assessed
Score based on 4 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.
Evaluation Friction
Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.
Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility
Comprehensive Security Analysis
In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations
Security Analysis
Executive Summary
| Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Security Grade | F | Needs Improvement |
| Risk Level | High | Not recommended |
| Enterprise Readiness | 38% | Gaps Exist |
| Critical Gaps | 0 | None |
Security Assessment
| Category | Score | Status | Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟢 Breach History | 100/100 | excellent | Maintain current controls |
| 🟡 Vulnerability Management | 85/100 | good | Maintain current controls |
| 🟠 API Security | 30/100 | needs_improvement | Add rate limiting and authentication |
| 🟠 Identity & Access Management | 25/100 | needs_improvement | URGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately |
| 🟠 Infrastructure Security | 20/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
| 🟠 Data Protection | 20/100 | needs_improvement | Implement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more |
| 🟠 Compliance & Certification | 0/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
| 🟠 Incident Response | 0/100 | needs_improvement | Document incident response plan |
Overall Grade: F (21/100)
Critical Security Gaps
| Gap | Severity | Business Impact | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟢 No dedicated security documentation page | LOW | Extended due diligence process | Request security whitepaper or public audit reports |
Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0
Compliance Status
| Framework | Status | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| ISO 27001 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| GDPR | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| HIPAA | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
| PCI DSS | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.
Operational Excellence
| Metric | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Status Page | ❌ Not Found | N/A |
| Documentation Quality | ❌ 4/10 | No SDKs |
| SLA Commitment | ❌ None | No public SLA |
| API Versioning | ✅ Yes | Breaking changes managed |
| Support Channels | ℹ️ 0 channels |
Operational Facts Extracted: 3 data points from operational_maturity enrichment
Integration Requirements
| Aspect | Details | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Time | 3-5 days (manual setup required) | Estimated deployment timeline |
| Known Issues | Manual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls needed | Implementation considerations |
⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration
Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:
Risk Level: LOW - Contains
Compliance & Certifications
API Intelligence
Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Qgiv.
API Intelligence
API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.
Incomplete API Intelligence
Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.
View Vendor DocumentationAI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis
LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.
Security Posture & Operational Capabilities
Comprehensive assessment of Qgiv's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.
Operational Maturity
Support, SLAs, and documentation quality
Documentation Quality
40% • FairFrequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Qgiv
Integrate with your CRM, email marketing tools, matching gifts services, QuickBooks, and other programs through Zapier to automate your administrative tasks and make more data-driven decisions.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Our system meets the most rigorous security standards as required by the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS).
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Your organization can add digital wallet donation options by accepting digital wallets, such as Apple Pay, Venmo, PayPal, and others, on their online fundraising platform based on the platform's requi
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
All Qgiv packages include access to dashboards and standard reporting features. If you're interested in custom reports, benchmarking, machine learning, AI, and donor summaries, you'll want to use the
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Compare with Alternatives
How does Qgiv stack up against similar applications in Vertical Industry Solutions? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.
| Application | Overall ScoreScore↓ | Grade | AI Security 🤖AI 🤖⇅ | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
51/100🏆 | B | N/A | View ProfileView | |
36/100 | D+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
34/100 | D | N/A | View ProfileView | |
26/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
22/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
QgivCurrent | 21/100 | F | N/A | |
21/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView |
Security Comparison Insight
18 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.