Skip to main content
Bonterra Volunteerism (formerly CyberGrants) logo

Bonterra Volunteerism (formerly CyberGrants) Security Assessment

Vertical Industry Solutions

Bonterra's Volunteerism solution captures essential volunteerism program data, automates required approvals, tracks hours, and calculates progress towards goals so you can achieve unsurpassed efficiencies for funding the causes you support.

Data: 3/8(38%)
HIGH Friction
SECURITY VERIFIED • SAASPOSTURE • JAN 2026
F
Bottom 20%
Bonterra Volunteerism (formerly CyberGrants) logoBonterra Volunteerism (formerly CyberGrants)
SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .
26
Overall Score
Weighted average across all dimensions
F
Security Grade
Critical
65% confidence

Identity & Access Management

F
Score:0
Weight:33%
Grade:F (Critical)

Compliance & Certification

F
Score:0
Weight:19%
Grade:F (Critical)

AI Integration Security

NEW
N/A
Score:0
Weight:12%
Grade:N/A

API Security

C+
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:C+ (Top 50%)

Infrastructure Security

F
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:F (Critical)

Data Protection

D
Score:0
Weight:10%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

Vulnerability Management

A+
Score:0
Weight:3%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Breach History

A+
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

A
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A (Top 10%)
🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 07:51 PM

Assessment Transparency

See exactly what data backs this security assessment

Data Coverage

3/8 security categories assessed

38%
complete
Identity & Access
Available
Compliance
Missing
API Security
Available
Infrastructure
Available
Data Protection
Missing
Vulnerability Mgmt
Missing
Incident Response
Missing
Breach History
Missing

Score based on 3 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.

Evaluation Friction

HIGH
Estimated: 4+ weeks
0% public documentation accessibility

Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.

11 data sources successful

Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility

Comprehensive Security Analysis

In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations

Security Analysis

Executive Summary

MetricValueAssessment
Security GradeFNeeds Improvement
Risk LevelHighNot recommended
Enterprise Readiness40%Gaps Exist
Critical Gaps0None

Security Assessment

CategoryScoreStatusAction Required
🟢 Breach History100/100excellentMaintain current controls
🟡 Vulnerability Management85/100goodMaintain current controls
🟠 Incident Response60/100needs_improvementMonitor and improve gradually
🟠 API Security49/100needs_improvementAdd rate limiting and authentication
🟠 Data Protection30/100needs_improvementImplement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more
🟠 Identity & Access Management25/100needs_improvementURGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately
🟠 Infrastructure Security25/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 Compliance & Certification0/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls

Overall Grade: F (26/100)

Critical Security Gaps

GapSeverityBusiness ImpactRecommendation
🟡 No public security documentation or audit reportsMEDIUM40-80 hours of security assessment overheadRequest security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper

Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0

Compliance Status

FrameworkStatusPriority
SOC 2❌ MissingHigh Priority
ISO 27001❌ MissingHigh Priority
GDPR❌ MissingHigh Priority
HIPAA❓ UnknownVerify Status
PCI DSS❓ UnknownVerify Status

Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.

Operational Excellence

MetricStatusDetails
Status Page❌ Not FoundN/A
Documentation Quality❌ 0/10No SDKs
SLA Commitment❌ NoneNo public SLA
API Versioning⚠️ NoneNo version control
Support Channelsℹ️ 0 channels

Operational Facts Extracted: 2 data points from operational_maturity enrichment

Integration Requirements

AspectDetailsNotes
Setup Time3-5 days (manual setup required)Estimated deployment timeline
Known IssuesManual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls neededImplementation considerations

⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration

Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:

Risk Level: LOW - Contains

Compliance & Certifications

0
Active
0
Pending
6
Not Certified

API Intelligence

Production-ready code examples for security operations, extracted from official Bonterra Volunteerism (formerly CyberGrants) API documentation using LLM analysis. Copy and paste these examples directly into your automation workflows.

API Intelligence

Incomplete

API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.

Incomplete API Intelligence

Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.

View Vendor Documentation

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of Bonterra Volunteerism (formerly CyberGrants)'s security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Data Not Yet Assessed

We haven't collected operational maturity data for Bonterra Volunteerism (formerly CyberGrants) yet.

🤖

Security Automation APIs

Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Bonterra Volunteerism (formerly CyberGrants)

API documentation should include examples of each call, parameters, and expected responses. Code samples for commonly used languages such as Java, JavaScript, PHP, and Python should be provided. Each API request should be explained in detail, including sample error messages and troubleshooting tips.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

API documentation should offer a comprehensive overview of every API endpoint and operation, including parameters, headers, and request and response bodies. It should also thoroughly explain the relevant data models, including their required attributes and any default, minimum, and maximum values.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Best practices for creating good API documentation Use Clear Language: When writing API documentation, it's important to keep in mind that users may have varying levels of technical expertise. For that reason, always use clear, straightforward language to ensure it's understandable for everyone.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Compare with Alternatives

How does Bonterra Volunteerism (formerly CyberGrants) stack up against similar applications in Vertical Industry Solutions? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application
Score
Grade
AI 🤖
Action
51🏆
BN/AView
36
D+N/AView
34
DN/AView
26
FN/A
22
FN/AView
22
FN/AView
21
FN/AView
💡

Security Comparison Insight

13 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.