Skip to main content
project44 logo

project44 Security Assessment

AI & Machine Learning

Movement by project44 connects all parties in the supply chain, helping them overcome friction from siloed data and old ways of working. With AI-powered insights, streamlined collaboration, and workflow automation, supply chain leaders can improve pre-transit planning, confidently manage inventory in-transit, streamline facilities operations, and deliver an exceptional customer experience.

Data: 7/8(88%)
HIGH Friction
SECURITY VERIFIED • SAASPOSTURE • JAN 2026
C
Top 50%
project44 logoproject44
SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .
49
Overall Score
Weighted average across all dimensions
C+
Security Grade
Top 50%
65% confidence

Identity & Access Management

C+
Score:0
Weight:33%
Grade:C+ (Top 50%)

Compliance & Certification

D+
Score:0
Weight:19%
Grade:D+ (Below Avg)

AI Integration Security

NEW
A
Score:0
Weight:12%
Grade:A (Top 10%)

API Security

A+
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Infrastructure Security

B
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:B (Top 25%)

Data Protection

F
Score:0
Weight:10%
Grade:F (Critical)

Vulnerability Management

A+
Score:0
Weight:3%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Breach History

A+
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

A
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A (Top 10%)
🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 16, 2026 at 07:06 AM

Assessment Transparency

See exactly what data backs this security assessment

Data Coverage

7/8 security categories assessed

88%
complete
Identity & Access
Available
Compliance
Available
API Security
Available
Infrastructure
Available
Data Protection
Available
Vulnerability Mgmt
Available
Incident Response
Available
Breach History
Missing

Score based on 7 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.

Evaluation Friction

HIGH
Estimated: 4+ weeks
0% public documentation accessibility

Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.

20 data sources successful

Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility

🤖

AI Integration Security

🔒 9th Dimension

Assess whether project44 is safe for AI agent integration. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards.

🔌

AI Readiness

Infrastructure for AI integration

D
44/100
MCP Available
🔌 MCP Server50/100
👨‍💻 Developer Experience0/100
📚 Documentation80/100
Top Recommendation:
⚠️ Official MCP server not found. Best alternative: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/38317 (Trust: 50/100)
🛡️

AI Security

Safety controls for AI agents

A
67.8/100
CAUTION
🔐 Authentication90%
🔒 Access Control100%
👁️ Observability35%
🔏 Data Privacy35%
✅ Excellent Security:
Add roles to the client application... Add the client application to the appropriate access groups... The project44 API offers authentication and authorization for client applications and integrations through the OAuth 2.0 client credentials grant type
⚠️ Needs Attention:
No mfa enforcement
🛡️Unique Assessment: Evaluating AI agent integration safety helps you make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors

Comprehensive Security Analysis

In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations

Security Analysis

Executive Summary

MetricValueAssessment
Security GradeC+Needs Improvement
Risk LevelHighNot recommended
Enterprise Readiness50%Gaps Exist
Critical Gaps0None

Security Assessment

CategoryScoreStatusAction Required
🟢 Breach History100/100excellentMaintain current controls
🟡 Vulnerability Management85/100goodMaintain current controls
🟡 API Security80/100goodMaintain current controls
🟠 Incident Response60/100needs_improvementMonitor and improve gradually
🟠 Infrastructure Security50/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 Identity & Access Management45/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 Compliance & Certification35/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 Data Protection20/100needs_improvementImplement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more

Overall Grade: C+ (49/100)

Critical Security Gaps

GapSeverityBusiness ImpactRecommendation
🟡 No public security documentation or audit reportsMEDIUM40-80 hours of security assessment overheadRequest security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper

Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0

Compliance Status

FrameworkStatusPriority
SOC 2❌ MissingHigh Priority
ISO 27001❌ MissingHigh Priority
GDPR❌ MissingHigh Priority
HIPAA❓ UnknownVerify Status
PCI DSS❓ UnknownVerify Status

Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.

Operational Excellence

MetricStatusDetails
Status Page✅ Availablehttps://status.project44.com
Documentation Quality❌ 0/10No SDKs
SLA Commitment✅ PublishedFormal SLA available
API Versioning⚠️ NoneNo version control
Support Channelsℹ️ 1 channelsEmail

Operational Facts Extracted: 6 data points from operational_maturity enrichment

Integration Requirements

AspectDetailsNotes
Setup Time3-5 days (manual setup required)Estimated deployment timeline
Known IssuesManual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls neededImplementation considerations

Authentication Capabilities

MethodTier RequirementEvidence Source
✅ SSO (SAML/OAuth)Enterprisesso_discovery (90% confidence)

Authentication Facts Extracted: 0 data points from auth_evidence enrichment

Security Incident History

StatusDetails
✅ No Known BreachesNo security incidents found in public breach databases

Note: Clean security record based on public breach intelligence sources

⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration

Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:

Risk Level: LOW - Contains

Compliance & Certifications

1
Active
0
Pending
5
Not Certified

AI Integration Security Assessment

Industry-first assessment evaluating whether project44 is safe and ready for AI agent integration. Covers AI security controls and readiness infrastructure for Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP).

AI Integration Security

Industry-first assessment for AI agent safety

A
GRADE
Top 10%
67.8
AI Security Score
🔐Authentication
90
🛡️Access Control
100
👁️Observability
35
🔒Data Privacy
35
📊Confidence Score
92%
CAUTION

Excellent Security Features

  • Add roles to the client application... Add the client application to the appropriate access groups... The project44 API offers authentication and authorization for client applications and integrations through the OAuth 2.0 client credentials grant type
  • Tokens last 12 hours... Access tokens expire in approximately 12 hours
  • The client credentials grant type is the simplest of several OAuth 2.0 authorization grant types is used to authorize client applications to access data in your project44 account without the context of an end user. Your application or integration itself is the agent making API requests to project44 on behalf of your users or a background process.
  • Servers: NA - Endpoint for project44 tenants created in the NA region https://na12.api.project44.com/ EU - Endpoint for project44 tenants created in the EU region https://eu12.api.project44.com/ Sandbox - Endpoint for project44 tenants created in the sandbox environment
  • Add Roles to Client Application... Add Client Application to Access Groups... extensive API categories including OAuth 2.0, Shipment Tracking, LTL, Volume LTL, TL, Rail, Multi-Modal, Webhooks, Capacity Provider, Analytics, YMS suggesting numerous permission scopes
  • You can only generate 5 tokens a minute... API Rate Limits section exists in documentation navigation
  • Webhooks - Webhook Shipment Webhook Data, Inventory Order and Load Webhook Data... Webhook Guide, Granular Webhooks sections in documentation
  • Page title references 'project44-bolsters-data-security-program-with-soc-2-type-ii-independent-audit' though full content was not extracted
  • Strong OAuth 2.0 implementation with client credentials grant
  • Short 12-hour token expiration improves security

⚠️Security Gaps & Recommendations

  • No mfa enforcement
  • No pii redaction
  • No training opt out
  • No audit logging
  • No ai attribution
  • No documented PII redaction capabilities
  • No AI training opt-out option documented
  • No audit logging documentation
ℹ️

AI Integration Security evaluates whether project44 is safe for AI agent access. This assessment considers authentication strength, access controls, observability capabilities, and data privacy protections when APIs are accessed by AI systems like Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, or custom AI agents.

AI Readiness Assessment

Evaluates readiness for AI agent integration

D
GRADE
Below Avg
44.0
AI Readiness Score
🔌
MCP Server Availability(40% weight)

Official or community MCP server support

50
👨‍💻
Developer Experience(30% weight)

API docs, SDKs, code examples

0
📚
Documentation Quality(30% weight)

API reference, auth flows, error handling

80

MCP Server Available

community

project44 supports Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) for secure AI agent integration.

View MCP Server

💡Recommendations

  • ⚠️ Official MCP server not found. Best alternative: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/38317 (Trust: 50/100)
  • ⚠️ ⚠️ Use with caution - review code before use
  • ⚠️ Limited AI capabilities - consider alternatives
📊Confidence Score
90%
🕐Last Verified
10/21/2025
ℹ️

AI Readiness measures whether project44provides the infrastructure and developer resources necessary for secure AI agent integration. High readiness indicates official MCP server support, comprehensive API documentation, and developer-friendly tools.

API Intelligence

Production-ready code examples for security operations, extracted from official project44 API documentation using LLM analysis. Copy and paste these examples directly into your automation workflows.

API Intelligence

Incomplete

API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.

Incomplete API Intelligence

Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.

View Vendor Documentation

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of project44's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Maturity

Support, SLAs, and documentation quality

Support Channels

📧
Email Support
🔐

Authentication Data Not Yet Assessed

We haven't collected authentication and authorization data for project44 yet.

🤖

Security Automation APIs

Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls

🛡️

No Known Breaches

project44 has no publicly disclosed security breaches in our database.

Clean Security Record

Compare with Alternatives

How does project44 stack up against similar applications in AI & Machine Learning? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application
Score
Grade
AI 🤖
Action
56🏆
B+N/AView
project44Current
49
C+67.8
49
C+N/AView
39
D+N/AView
36
D+N/AView
28
FN/AView
23
FN/AView
💡

Security Comparison Insight

3 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.