Skip to main content
Panop SA logo

Panop SA Security Assessment

Security & Compliance

Panop is a Next Generation Attack Surface Management Solution, It enables customers to understand in minutes their degree of exposure to extarnal attack, the integrated solution enables customers to automatically remediate identified issues.

Data: 5/8(63%)
HIGH Friction
SECURITY VERIFIED • SAASPOSTURE • JAN 2026
F
Bottom 20%
Panop SA logoPanop SA
SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .
24
Overall Score
Weighted average across all dimensions
F
Security Grade
Critical
65% confidence

Identity & Access Management

F
Score:0
Weight:33%
Grade:F (Critical)

Compliance & Certification

F
Score:0
Weight:19%
Grade:F (Critical)

AI Integration Security

NEW
N/A
Score:0
Weight:12%
Grade:N/A

API Security

B
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:B (Top 25%)

Infrastructure Security

D
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

Data Protection

D
Score:0
Weight:10%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

Vulnerability Management

F
Score:0
Weight:3%
Grade:F (Critical)

Breach History

A+
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

A
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A (Top 10%)
🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 16, 2026 at 07:11 AM

Assessment Transparency

See exactly what data backs this security assessment

Data Coverage

5/8 security categories assessed

63%
complete
Identity & Access
Blocked
Compliance
Available
API Security
Available
Infrastructure
Blocked
Data Protection
Available
Vulnerability Mgmt
Available
Incident Response
Available
Breach History
Missing

Score based on 5 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.

Evaluation Friction

HIGH
Estimated: 4+ weeks
0% public documentation accessibility

Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.

29 data sources successful(2 blocked)
2 Data Sources Blocked

This vendor is actively blocking 2 automated data collection sourcesthrough bot protection, authentication requirements, or access restrictions.

What this means: The security assessment may be incomplete because the vendor is restricting access to public security information. Manual verification may be required during procurement.

Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility

Comprehensive Security Analysis

In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations

Security Analysis

Executive Summary

MetricValueAssessment
Security GradeFNeeds Improvement
Risk LevelHighNot recommended
Enterprise Readiness40%Gaps Exist
Critical Gaps0None

Security Assessment

CategoryScoreStatusAction Required
🟢 Breach History100/100excellentMaintain current controls
🟠 Incident Response60/100needs_improvementMonitor and improve gradually
🟠 API Security50/100needs_improvementAdd rate limiting and authentication
🟠 Infrastructure Security30/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 Data Protection30/100needs_improvementImplement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more
🟠 Identity & Access Management25/100needs_improvementURGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately
🟠 Compliance & Certification0/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 Vulnerability Management0/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls

Overall Grade: F (24/100)

Critical Security Gaps

GapSeverityBusiness ImpactRecommendation
🟡 No public security documentation or audit reportsMEDIUM40-80 hours of security assessment overheadRequest security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper

Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0

Compliance Status

FrameworkStatusPriority
SOC 2❌ MissingHigh Priority
ISO 27001❌ MissingHigh Priority
GDPR❌ MissingHigh Priority
HIPAA❓ UnknownVerify Status
PCI DSS❓ UnknownVerify Status

Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.

Operational Excellence

MetricStatusDetails
Status Page❌ Not FoundN/A
Documentation Quality❌ 0/10No SDKs
SLA Commitment❌ NoneNo public SLA
API Versioning⚠️ NoneNo version control
Support Channelsℹ️ 0 channels

Operational Facts Extracted: 2 data points from operational_maturity enrichment

Integration Requirements

AspectDetailsNotes
Setup Time3-5 days (manual setup required)Estimated deployment timeline
Known IssuesManual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls neededImplementation considerations

⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration

Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:

Risk Level: LOW - Contains

Compliance & Certifications

0
Active
0
Pending
6
Not Certified

API Intelligence

Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Panop SA.

API Intelligence

Auth Required

API requires authentication or sales engagement to access documentation. Contact vendor for API access.

Authentication Required

API access requires authentication or sales engagement. Many enterprise vendors provide API documentation only to customers or after contacting sales.

Contact Sales

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of Panop SA's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Data Not Yet Assessed

We haven't collected operational maturity data for Panop SA yet.

🤖

Security Automation APIs

Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Panop SA

While API references delve into the technical details of individual functions, API documentation offers a more holistic perspective. It includes the API reference information but expands upon it with additional explanations, usage guidelines, and best practices.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Reference Documentation: This type of API documentation typically offers a detailed overview of each endpoint, outlining its methods, parameters, and supported data types. It also explains in simple terms the purpose of each endpoint and how it should be used.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

At minimum, an API reference should contain a guide called "Using the name-of-api", which will provide a basic guide to how to use the API. More complex APIs may require multiple usage guides to explain how to use different aspects of the API.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

With Postman, you can: Automatically generate API documentation: Postman enables users to automatically generate API documentation for any OpenAPI 3.0 definition, as well as for any collection they create.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Compare with Alternatives

How does Panop SA stack up against similar applications in Security & Compliance? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application
Score
Grade
AI 🤖
Action
44🏆
CN/AView
43
CN/AView
35
D+N/AView
30
DN/AView
25
FN/AView
Panop SACurrent
24
FN/A
23
FN/AView
💡

Security Comparison Insight

18 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.