Netwrix Security Assessment
Security & Compliance
The NNT ITSM Integration Module, developed by Netwrix, is designed to seamlessly integrate New Net Technologies (NNT solutions with ServiceNow's IT Service Management (ITSM platform. This integration enhances network management by automating incident creation and management, thereby reducing manual efforts and improving response times. Key Features and Functionality: - Automated Incident Management: Direct integration between NNT and ServiceNow ITSM enables automatic creation and management of network incidents, streamlining the incident response process. - Real-Time Network Monitoring: Provides continuous monitoring of network configurations and changes, ensuring immediate detection and reporting of unauthorized modifications. - Enhanced Change Management: Facilitates better control over network changes by integrating NNT's change management capabilities with ServiceNow's ITSM workflows. - Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed reports and dashboards within ServiceNow, providing insights into network security and compliance status. Primary Value and User Benefits: The NNT ITSM Integration Module addresses the challenge of managing network incidents and changes efficiently. By automating the incident creation process and providing real-time monitoring, it reduces downtime and enhances network stability. Users benefit from a centralized view of their IT environment, enabling swift issue resolution and optimal resource utilization. This integration ultimately leads to improved operational efficiency and a stronger security posture.
9-Dimension Security Framework
Identity & Access Management
Compliance & Certification
AI Integration Security
NEWAPI Security
Infrastructure Security
Data Protection
Vulnerability Management
Breach History
Incident Response
AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)
Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.
Last updated: January 9, 2026 at 12:33 PM
AI Integration Security
🔒 9th DimensionAssess whether Netwrix is safe for AI agent integration. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards.
AI Readiness
Infrastructure for AI integration
AI Security
Safety controls for AI agents
Comprehensive Security Analysis
In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations
Security Analysis
Executive Summary
| Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Security Grade | A | Needs Improvement |
| Risk Level | Medium | Implement controls |
| Enterprise Readiness | 75% | Ready |
| Critical Gaps | 0 | None |
Security Assessment
| Category | Score | Status | Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟢 Breach History | 100/100 | excellent | Maintain current controls |
| 🟢 Compliance & Certification | 90/100 | excellent | Maintain current controls |
| 🟡 Vulnerability Management | 85/100 | good | Maintain current controls |
| 🟡 Identity & Access Management | 70/100 | good | Monitor and improve gradually |
| 🟠 Incident Response | 60/100 | needs_improvement | Monitor and improve gradually |
| 🟠 Data Protection | 55/100 | needs_improvement | Implement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more |
| 🟠 API Security | 50/100 | needs_improvement | Add rate limiting and authentication |
| 🟠 Infrastructure Security | 50/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
Overall Grade: A (68/100)
Critical Security Gaps
| Gap | Severity | Business Impact | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟡 No public security documentation or audit reports | MEDIUM | 40-80 hours of security assessment overhead | Request security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper |
Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0
Compliance Status
| Certification | Status |
|---|---|
| ✅ SOC 2 | Active |
| ✅ ISO 27001 | Active |
| ✅ GDPR | Active |
Note: Compliance certifications verified from public sources and vendor documentation.
Operational Excellence
| Metric | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Status Page | ❌ Not Found | N/A |
| Documentation Quality | ❌ 0/10 | No SDKs |
| SLA Commitment | ❌ None | No public SLA |
| API Versioning | ⚠️ None | No version control |
| Support Channels | ℹ️ 0 channels |
Operational Facts Extracted: 2 data points from operational_maturity enrichment
Infrastructure Security
| Infrastructure Metric | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| VirusTotal Reputation | ✅ 100/100 | 95 security engines scanned |
| SSL/TLS Certificate | ✅ Valid | Issued by Unknown |
| Certificate Expiry | ℹ️ Unknown | Regular renewal required |
| Domain Age | ✅ 19 years | Established |
Infrastructure Facts Extracted: 4 data points from virustotal_intelligence
Integration Requirements
| Aspect | Details | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Time | 3-5 days (manual setup required) | Estimated deployment timeline |
| Known Issues | Manual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls needed | Implementation considerations |
Authentication Capabilities
| Method | Tier Requirement | Evidence Source |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ SSO (SAML/OAuth) | Enterprise | sso_discovery (90% confidence) |
Authentication Facts Extracted: 0 data points from auth_evidence enrichment
🏆 Why Netwrix Earns Top 10% Security Rating
Netwrix demonstrates exceptional security practices across multiple dimensions:
Operational Excellence
- ✅ No public status page found - incident communication may be limited (operational_excellence_enricher)
- ✅ No API versioning detected - breaking changes may occur without notice (operational_excellence_enricher)
Infrastructure Security
- ✅ VirusTotal reputation: 100/100 (0 malicious, 0 suspicious from 95 security engines) (virustotal_enricher)
- ✅ Domain registered 19 years ago (2006-06-20T13:31:34Z) - Very High trust level (virustotal_enricher)
- ✅ Domain registrar: trustandsafety@support.aws.com (virustotal_enricher)
- ✅ TLS/SSL fingerprint (JARM): 40d40d40d0000000... - unique infrastructure signature (virustotal_enricher)
Security Category Excellence
- ✅ Breach History: 100/100 - excellent
- ✅ Compliance & Certification: 90/100 - excellent
- ✅ Vulnerability Management: 85/100 - good
📊 Areas for Improvement
Incident Response: 60/100 - needs_improvement
What This Means: The vendor has disclosed security incidents that impacted their breach history score.
Actionable Recommendations:
- Request detailed incident post-mortems and remediation evidence
- Verify security improvements implemented since last incident
- Implement additional monitoring for early breach detection
- Review vendor's incident response SLAs in your contract
- Consider cyber insurance requirements for vendor breaches
- Evaluate vendor's incident notification timeline vs. your compliance requirements
Data Protection: 55/100 - needs_improvement
Recommendation: Conduct detailed assessment of Data Protection practices to improve from 55/100.
General Actions:
- Request vendor documentation specific to Data Protection
- Compare against industry benchmarks and best practices
- Identify specific gaps through security questionnaire
- Evaluate impact on your organization's risk profile
- Consider contractual requirements or remediation timeline
API Security: 50/100 - needs_improvement
What This Means: Limited API capabilities for security automation.
Actionable Recommendations:
- Request API documentation and capabilities roadmap
- Evaluate webhooks for security event notifications
- Assess user provisioning/deprovisioning automation options
- Review API rate limits and authentication methods
- Consider manual process overhead in TCO calculations
- Request notification of API deprecations and breaking changes
Infrastructure Security: 50/100 - needs_improvement
Recommendation: Conduct detailed assessment of Infrastructure Security practices to improve from 50/100.
General Actions:
- Request vendor documentation specific to Infrastructure Security
- Compare against industry benchmarks and best practices
- Identify specific gaps through security questionnaire
- Evaluate impact on your organization's risk profile
- Consider contractual requirements or remediation timeline
⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration
Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:
Risk Level: LOW - Contains
🛡️ Enterprise Security Controls to Implement
Even with strong vendor security, enterprises must implement:
1. Identity & Access Management
- Enable SSO with your identity provider
- Implement MFA for all user accounts
- Regular access reviews (quarterly recommended)
Compliance & Certifications
AI Integration Security Assessment
Industry-first assessment evaluating whether Netwrix is safe and ready for AI agent integration. Covers AI security controls and readiness infrastructure for Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP).
AI Integration Security
Industry-first assessment for AI agent safety
✅Excellent Security Features
- ●Role-Based Access and Delegation: To Retrieve all activity records and write data - Global administrator role; To Retrieve all activity records - Global reviewer role; To Retrieve activity records within a limited scope - Reviewer role on a monitoring plan
- ●Netwrix Auditor is a visibility platform for user behavior analysis and risk mitigation that enables control over changes, configurations and access in hybrid IT environments... The platform provides security analytics to detect anomalies in user behavior and investigate threat patterns
- ●Comprehensive audit logging and user behavior analysis
- ●Role-based access control with multiple permission levels
- ●OAuth 2.0 client credentials authentication
⚠️Security Gaps & Recommendations
- ●No oauth scopes
- ●No token rotation
- ●No pii redaction
- ●No training opt out
- ●No ai attribution
- ●No rate limiting
- ●No webhooks
- ●No security program
- ●Refresh tokens never expire - security risk
- ●Token expiration intervals are not configurable
AI Integration Security evaluates whether Netwrix is safe for AI agent access. This assessment considers authentication strength, access controls, observability capabilities, and data privacy protections when APIs are accessed by AI systems like Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, or custom AI agents.
AI Readiness Assessment
Evaluates readiness for AI agent integration
Official or community MCP server support
API docs, SDKs, code examples
API reference, auth flows, error handling
MCP Server Available
Netwrix supports Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) for secure AI agent integration.
💡Recommendations
- →⚠️ Official MCP server not found. Best alternative: https://github.com/netwrix/mcp-server-auditor (Trust: 5/100)
- →⚠️ 🔴 High Risk: Repository appears abandoned
- →❌ Poor AI readiness - not recommended for AI workflows
AI Readiness measures whether Netwrixprovides the infrastructure and developer resources necessary for secure AI agent integration. High readiness indicates official MCP server support, comprehensive API documentation, and developer-friendly tools.
API Intelligence
Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Netwrix.
API Intelligence
No public API documentation found. This vendor may not offer a public API.
No API Found
We didn't find public API documentation for this vendor. Many SaaS vendors, especially SMB-focused tools, don't offer public REST APIs. This is normal and not a data quality issue.
Note: Not all SaaS vendors offer public APIs. This is completely normal, especially for SMB-focused tools. It doesn't affect the security assessment.
AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis
LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.
Security Posture & Operational Capabilities
Comprehensive assessment of Netwrix's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.
Operational Data Not Yet Assessed
We haven't collected operational maturity data for Netwrix yet.
Authentication Data Not Yet Assessed
We haven't collected authentication and authorization data for Netwrix yet.
Security Automation APIs
Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls
Data confidence: 80% • Assessed from API documentation and developer portal analysis
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Netwrix
Netwrix Endpoint Protector's real-time DLP engine actively monitors and safeguards your sensitive data, preventing breaches, unauthorized sharing and malicious exfiltration to achieve regulatory compl
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Web DLP can be an added security layer to prevent data loss and data leaks. Learn more about Data Loss Prevention. Endpoint DLPs offer the possibility to monitor and control sensitive data and prevent
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Compare with Alternatives
How does Netwrix stack up against similar applications in Security & Compliance? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.
| Application | Overall ScoreScore↓ | Grade | AI Security 🤖AI 🤖⇅ | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NetwrixCurrent | 68/100🏆 | A | 73/100 | |
44/100 | C | N/A | View ProfileView | |
43/100 | C | N/A | View ProfileView | |
35/100 | D+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
30/100 | D | N/A | View ProfileView | |
25/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
23/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView |
Security Comparison Insight
Netwrix has the highest security score (68/100) among these alternatives. Strong choice for security-conscious organizations.