Skip to main content
NetApp logo

NetApp Security Assessment

Security & Compliance

Maintain continuous data availability for your business-critical applications.

Data: 7/8(88%)
MODERATE Friction
SECURITY VERIFIED • SAASPOSTURE • JAN 2026
D
Bottom 30%
NetApp logoNetApp
SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .
35
Overall Score
Weighted average across all dimensions
D+
Security Grade
Below Avg
65% confidence

Identity & Access Management

F
Score:0
Weight:33%
Grade:F (Critical)

Compliance & Certification

D
Score:0
Weight:19%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

AI Integration Security

NEW
N/A
Score:0
Weight:12%
Grade:N/A

API Security

B
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:B (Top 25%)

Infrastructure Security

F
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:F (Critical)

Data Protection

A+
Score:0
Weight:10%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Vulnerability Management

A+
Score:0
Weight:3%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Breach History

A+
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

A
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A (Top 10%)
🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 16, 2026 at 05:43 AM

Assessment Transparency

See exactly what data backs this security assessment

Data Coverage

7/8 security categories assessed

88%
complete
Identity & Access
Available
Compliance
Available
API Security
Available
Infrastructure
Available
Data Protection
Available
Vulnerability Mgmt
Available
Incident Response
Available
Breach History
Missing

Score based on 7 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.

Evaluation Friction

MODERATE
Estimated: 2-4 weeks
0% public documentation accessibility

Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.

31 data sources successful

Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility

Comprehensive Security Analysis

In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations

Security Analysis

Executive Summary

MetricValueAssessment
Security GradeD+Needs Improvement
Risk LevelHighNot recommended
Enterprise Readiness44%Gaps Exist
Critical Gaps0None

Security Assessment

CategoryScoreStatusAction Required
🟢 Breach History100/100excellentMaintain current controls
🟡 Vulnerability Management85/100goodMaintain current controls
🟡 Data Protection75/100goodMonitor and improve gradually
🟠 Incident Response60/100needs_improvementMonitor and improve gradually
🟠 API Security50/100needs_improvementAdd rate limiting and authentication
🟠 Compliance & Certification30/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 Identity & Access Management25/100needs_improvementURGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately
🟠 Infrastructure Security20/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls

Overall Grade: D+ (35/100)

Critical Security Gaps

GapSeverityBusiness ImpactRecommendation
🟢 No dedicated security documentation pageLOWExtended due diligence processRequest security whitepaper or public audit reports

Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0

Compliance Status

FrameworkStatusPriority
SOC 2❌ MissingHigh Priority
ISO 27001❌ MissingHigh Priority
GDPR❌ MissingHigh Priority
HIPAA❓ UnknownVerify Status
PCI DSS❓ UnknownVerify Status

Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.

Operational Excellence

MetricStatusDetails
Status Page❌ Not FoundN/A
Documentation Quality⚠️ 5/10No SDKs
SLA Commitment❌ NoneNo public SLA
API Versioning⚠️ NoneNo version control
Support Channelsℹ️ 0 channels

Operational Facts Extracted: 3 data points from operational_maturity enrichment

Integration Requirements

AspectDetailsNotes
Setup Time3-5 days (manual setup required)Estimated deployment timeline
Known IssuesManual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls neededImplementation considerations

⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration

Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:

Risk Level: LOW - Contains

Compliance & Certifications

0
Active
0
Pending
6
Not Certified

API Intelligence

Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for NetApp.

API Intelligence

Incomplete

API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.

Incomplete API Intelligence

Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.

View Vendor Documentation

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of NetApp's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Maturity

Support, SLAs, and documentation quality

Documentation Quality

50% • Fair

Compare with Alternatives

How does NetApp stack up against similar applications in Security & Compliance? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application
Score
Grade
AI 🤖
Action
44🏆
CN/AView
43
CN/AView
NetAppCurrent
35
D+N/A
35
D+N/AView
30
DN/AView
25
FN/AView
23
FN/AView
💡

Security Comparison Insight

7 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.