Skip to main content
indigitall logo

indigitall Security Assessment

AI & Machine Learning

indigitall is the only platform that integrates all outgoing and incoming channels to streamline and enhance your communication with customers, ensuring an excellent user experience while attracting new leads and generating more sales and opportunities. It is an omnichannel platform focused on digital communication, marketing automation, cybersecurity, and customer journey management, leveraging the most innovative technology and integrating generative artificial intelligence, all integrated into a single platform for use and data analysis.

Data: 6/8(75%)
HIGH Friction
SECURITY VERIFIED • SAASPOSTURE • JAN 2026
B
Top 25%
indigitall logoindigitall
SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .
50
Overall Score
Weighted average across all dimensions
B
Security Grade
Top 25%
52% confidence

Identity & Access Management

A
Score:0
Weight:33%
Grade:A (Top 10%)

API Security

B
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:B (Top 25%)

AI Integration Security

NEW
F
Score:0
Weight:12%
Grade:F (Critical)

Infrastructure Security

B
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:B (Top 25%)

Data Protection

F
Score:0
Weight:10%
Grade:F (Critical)

Vulnerability Management

A+
Score:0
Weight:3%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Breach History

A+
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

A
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A (Top 10%)
🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 16, 2026 at 05:48 AM

Assessment Transparency

See exactly what data backs this security assessment

Data Coverage

6/8 security categories assessed

75%
complete
Identity & Access
Available
Compliance
Available
API Security
Available
Infrastructure
Available
Data Protection
Available
Vulnerability Mgmt
Missing
Incident Response
Available
Breach History
Missing

Score based on 6 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.

Evaluation Friction

HIGH
Estimated: 4+ weeks
0% public documentation accessibility

Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.

17 data sources successful

Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility

🤖

AI Integration Security

🔒 9th Dimension

Assess whether indigitall is safe for AI agent integration. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards.

🔌

AI Readiness

Infrastructure for AI integration

F
24/100
No MCP Server
🔌 MCP Server0/100
👨‍💻 Developer Experience0/100
📚 Documentation80/100
Top Recommendation:
❌ No MCP servers found - AI agent integration not available
🛡️

AI Security

Safety controls for AI agents

F
18.5/100
HIGH_RISK
🔐 Authentication15%
🔒 Access Control20%
👁️ Observability30%
🔏 Data Privacy15%
✅ Excellent Security:
Encrypted Push feature mentioned (WiZink banking success story)
⚠️ Needs Attention:
No oauth scopes
🛡️Unique Assessment: Evaluating AI agent integration safety helps you make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors

Essential Security Analysis

Based on available security assessment data

50
Security Score
B
Security Grade
0
Compliance Frameworks

Compliance & Certifications

0
Active
0
Pending
6
Not Certified

AI Integration Security Assessment

Industry-first assessment evaluating whether indigitall is safe and ready for AI agent integration. Covers AI security controls and readiness infrastructure for Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP).

AI Integration Security

Industry-first assessment for AI agent safety

F
GRADE
Critical
18.5
AI Security Score
🔐Authentication
15
🛡️Access Control
20
👁️Observability
30
🔒Data Privacy
15
📊Confidence Score
78%
HIGH_RISK

Excellent Security Features

  • Encrypted Push feature mentioned (WiZink banking success story)
  • HIPAA compliance awareness with dedicated blog content
  • Code of Ethics for AI section exists

⚠️Security Gaps & Recommendations

  • No oauth scopes
  • No token expiration
  • No token rotation
  • No service accounts
  • No mfa enforcement
  • No pii redaction
  • No training opt out
  • No data residency
  • No gdpr compliance
  • No read only tokens
ℹ️

AI Integration Security evaluates whether indigitall is safe for AI agent access. This assessment considers authentication strength, access controls, observability capabilities, and data privacy protections when APIs are accessed by AI systems like Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, or custom AI agents.

AI Readiness Assessment

Evaluates readiness for AI agent integration

F
GRADE
Critical
24.0
AI Readiness Score
🔌
MCP Server Availability(40% weight)

Official or community MCP server support

0
👨‍💻
Developer Experience(30% weight)

API docs, SDKs, code examples

0
📚
Documentation Quality(30% weight)

API reference, auth flows, error handling

80
🚨

Shadow AI Risk: HIGH

No official MCP server detected. AI agents may use undocumented APIs or web scraping, increasing security risks and reliability issues. indigitall should implement MCP support for secure AI integration.

💡Recommendations

  • ❌ No MCP servers found - AI agent integration not available
  • ❌ Poor AI readiness - not recommended for AI workflows
📊Confidence Score
100%
🕐Last Verified
10/21/2025
ℹ️

AI Readiness measures whether indigitallprovides the infrastructure and developer resources necessary for secure AI agent integration. High readiness indicates official MCP server support, comprehensive API documentation, and developer-friendly tools.

API Intelligence

Production-ready code examples for security operations, extracted from official indigitall API documentation using LLM analysis. Copy and paste these examples directly into your automation workflows.

API Intelligence

Incomplete

API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.

Incomplete API Intelligence

Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.

View Vendor Documentation

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of indigitall's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Maturity

Support, SLAs, and documentation quality

Documentation Quality

50% • Fair
🔐

Authentication Data Not Yet Assessed

We haven't collected authentication and authorization data for indigitall yet.

🤖

Security Automation APIs

Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls

🛡️

No Known Breaches

indigitall has no publicly disclosed security breaches in our database.

Clean Security Record

Compare with Alternatives

How does indigitall stack up against similar applications in AI & Machine Learning? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application
Score
Grade
AI 🤖
Action
56🏆
B+N/AView
indigitallCurrent
50
B18.5
49
C+N/AView
39
D+N/AView
36
D+N/AView
28
FN/AView
23
FN/AView
💡

Security Comparison Insight

3 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.

Research Sources

56 citations for indigitall

90%Quality

Data from static JSON · Last enriched: October 8, 2025