Skip to main content
HUMAN logo

HUMAN Security Assessment

Security & Compliance

HUMAN's Transaction Abuse Defense is a sophisticated solution designed to protect online platforms from automated fraudulent activities, including carding, scalping, and inventory hoarding. By leveraging machine learning, intelligent fingerprinting, and behavioral analysis, it effectively detects and mitigates bot-driven transactions, ensuring a secure and seamless user experience. Key Features and Functionality: - Fraudulent Transaction Prevention: Utilizes advanced algorithms to identify and block automated purchases made with stolen credit card information, thereby reducing chargebacks and associated costs. - Scalping and Inventory Hoarding Mitigation: Prevents bots from rapidly purchasing high-demand products for resale, preserving product availability for genuine customers and maintaining brand reputation. - Infrastructure Optimization: Blocks malicious bot traffic at the edge of the network, minimizing bandwidth strain and enhancing website performance. - User Experience Preservation: Employs low-latency technology and user-friendly verification challenges to ensure that security measures do not disrupt legitimate customer interactions. Primary Value and User Solutions: Transaction Abuse Defense addresses critical challenges faced by online businesses by: - Reducing Financial Losses: By stopping automated fraudulent transactions, it minimizes chargebacks, processing costs, and refund fees. - Enhancing Customer Trust: Ensures product availability and a smooth purchasing process, fostering customer satisfaction and loyalty. - Improving Operational Efficiency: By mitigating bot traffic before it reaches application servers, it optimizes infrastructure costs and maintains optimal website performance. In summary, HUMAN's Transaction Abuse Defense provides a comprehensive and proactive approach to safeguarding online transactions, protecting both businesses and their customers from the detrimental effects of automated fraud.

SECURITY VERIFIED • SAASPOSTURE • JAN 2026
D
Bottom 30%
HUMAN logoHUMAN
SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .
33
Overall Score
Weighted average across all dimensions
D
Security Grade
Below Avg
65% confidence

Identity & Access Management

F
Score:0
Weight:33%
Grade:F (Critical)

Compliance & Certification

F
Score:0
Weight:19%
Grade:F (Critical)

AI Integration Security

NEW
F
Score:0
Weight:12%
Grade:F (Critical)

API Security

A
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:A (Top 10%)

Infrastructure Security

D
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

Data Protection

A+
Score:0
Weight:10%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Vulnerability Management

A+
Score:0
Weight:3%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Breach History

A+
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

A
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A (Top 10%)
🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 9, 2026 at 12:33 PM

🤖

AI Integration Security

🔒 9th Dimension

Assess whether HUMAN is safe for AI agent integration. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards.

🔌

AI Readiness

Infrastructure for AI integration

F
23/100
🔌 MCP Server20/100
👨‍💻 Developer Experience0/100
📚 Documentation50/100
Top Recommendation:
❌ Poor AI readiness - not recommended for AI workflows
🛡️

AI Security

Safety controls for AI agents

F
29.5/100
HIGH_RISK
🔐 Authentication30%
🔒 Access Control40%
👁️ Observability40%
🔏 Data Privacy15%
✅ Excellent Security:
Data Processing Addendum page exists at /data-processing-addendum/ and GDPR topic page exists at /learn/topics/what-is-gdpr/, indicating GDPR compliance support
⚠️ Needs Attention:
No oauth scopes
🛡️Unique Assessment: Evaluating AI agent integration safety helps you make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors

Comprehensive Security Analysis

In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations

Security Analysis

Executive Summary

MetricValueAssessment
Security GradeDNeeds Improvement
Risk LevelHighNot recommended
Enterprise Readiness43%Gaps Exist
Critical Gaps0None

Security Assessment

CategoryScoreStatusAction Required
🟢 Breach History100/100excellentMaintain current controls
🟡 Vulnerability Management85/100goodMaintain current controls
🟡 Data Protection70/100goodMonitor and improve gradually
🟠 API Security60/100needs_improvementMonitor and improve gradually
🟠 Incident Response60/100needs_improvementMonitor and improve gradually
🟠 Infrastructure Security30/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 Identity & Access Management25/100needs_improvementURGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately
🟠 Compliance & Certification0/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls

Overall Grade: D (33/100)

Critical Security Gaps

GapSeverityBusiness ImpactRecommendation
🟡 No public security documentation or audit reportsMEDIUM40-80 hours of security assessment overheadRequest security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper

Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0

Compliance Status

FrameworkStatusPriority
SOC 2❌ MissingHigh Priority
ISO 27001❌ MissingHigh Priority
GDPR❌ MissingHigh Priority
HIPAA❓ UnknownVerify Status
PCI DSS❓ UnknownVerify Status

Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.

Operational Excellence

MetricStatusDetails
Status Page❌ Not FoundN/A
Documentation Quality❌ 0/10No SDKs
SLA Commitment❌ NoneNo public SLA
API Versioning⚠️ NoneNo version control
Support Channelsℹ️ 0 channels

Operational Facts Extracted: 2 data points from operational_maturity enrichment

Infrastructure Security

Infrastructure MetricStatusDetails
VirusTotal Reputation✅ 100/10095 security engines scanned
SSL/TLS Certificate✅ ValidIssued by Unknown
Certificate Expiryℹ️ UnknownRegular renewal required
Domain Age🔴 0 yearsNewer vendor

Infrastructure Facts Extracted: 3 data points from virustotal_intelligence

Integration Requirements

AspectDetailsNotes
Setup Time3-5 days (manual setup required)Estimated deployment timeline
Known IssuesManual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls neededImplementation considerations

⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration

Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:

Risk Level: LOW - Contains

Compliance & Certifications

0
Active
0
Pending
6
Not Certified

AI Integration Security Assessment

Industry-first assessment evaluating whether HUMAN is safe and ready for AI agent integration. Covers AI security controls and readiness infrastructure for Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP).

AI Integration Security

Industry-first assessment for AI agent safety

F
GRADE
Critical
29.5
AI Security Score
🔐Authentication
30
🛡️Access Control
40
👁️Observability
40
🔒Data Privacy
15
📊Confidence Score
86%
HIGH_RISK

Excellent Security Features

  • Data Processing Addendum page exists at /data-processing-addendum/ and GDPR topic page exists at /learn/topics/what-is-gdpr/, indicating GDPR compliance support
  • We support pushing data to you via: Datadog, Email to Consumer, HTTP Web Hook, Splunk HTTP Event Collector (HEC), AWS S3, SumoLogic, Syslog. By adding a new integration, or selecting an existing integration, you will be routed to the integration details page
  • Strong webhook/integration support with 7+ platforms including Datadog, Splunk, AWS S3
  • GDPR compliance with Data Processing Addendum available
  • Role-based access control with multiple predefined roles (Application owner, IT/Devops, Admin, User manager)

⚠️Security Gaps & Recommendations

  • No oauth scopes
  • No token expiration
  • No token rotation
  • No pii redaction
  • No training opt out
  • No data residency
  • No read only tokens
  • No action restrictions
  • No audit logging
  • No rate limiting
ℹ️

AI Integration Security evaluates whether HUMAN is safe for AI agent access. This assessment considers authentication strength, access controls, observability capabilities, and data privacy protections when APIs are accessed by AI systems like Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, or custom AI agents.

AI Readiness Assessment

Evaluates readiness for AI agent integration

F
GRADE
Critical
23.0
AI Readiness Score
🔌
MCP Server Availability(40% weight)

Official or community MCP server support

20
👨‍💻
Developer Experience(30% weight)

API docs, SDKs, code examples

0
📚
Documentation Quality(30% weight)

API reference, auth flows, error handling

50

MCP Server Available

HUMAN supports Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) for secure AI agent integration.

💡Recommendations

  • ❌ Poor AI readiness - not recommended for AI workflows
📊Confidence Score
70%
ℹ️

AI Readiness measures whether HUMANprovides the infrastructure and developer resources necessary for secure AI agent integration. High readiness indicates official MCP server support, comprehensive API documentation, and developer-friendly tools.

API Intelligence

Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for HUMAN.

API Intelligence

No API Found

No public API documentation found. This vendor may not offer a public API.

No API Found

We didn't find public API documentation for this vendor. Many SaaS vendors, especially SMB-focused tools, don't offer public REST APIs. This is normal and not a data quality issue.

Note: Not all SaaS vendors offer public APIs. This is completely normal, especially for SMB-focused tools. It doesn't affect the security assessment.

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of HUMAN's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Data Not Yet Assessed

We haven't collected operational maturity data for HUMAN yet.

🤖

Security Automation APIs

Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls

Automation Score
2.0/10
Limited
Confidence
60%
📚

API Documentation

View complete API reference for HUMAN

View Docs →

Data confidence: 60% • Assessed from API documentation and developer portal analysis

Compare with Alternatives

How does HUMAN stack up against similar applications in Security & Compliance? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application
Score
Grade
AI 🤖
Action
44🏆
CN/AView
43
CN/AView
35
D+N/AView
HUMANCurrent
33
D29.5
30
DN/AView
25
FN/AView
23
FN/AView
💡

Security Comparison Insight

8 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.