HUMAN Security Assessment
Security & Compliance
HUMAN's Transaction Abuse Defense is a sophisticated solution designed to protect online platforms from automated fraudulent activities, including carding, scalping, and inventory hoarding. By leveraging machine learning, intelligent fingerprinting, and behavioral analysis, it effectively detects and mitigates bot-driven transactions, ensuring a secure and seamless user experience. Key Features and Functionality: - Fraudulent Transaction Prevention: Utilizes advanced algorithms to identify and block automated purchases made with stolen credit card information, thereby reducing chargebacks and associated costs. - Scalping and Inventory Hoarding Mitigation: Prevents bots from rapidly purchasing high-demand products for resale, preserving product availability for genuine customers and maintaining brand reputation. - Infrastructure Optimization: Blocks malicious bot traffic at the edge of the network, minimizing bandwidth strain and enhancing website performance. - User Experience Preservation: Employs low-latency technology and user-friendly verification challenges to ensure that security measures do not disrupt legitimate customer interactions. Primary Value and User Solutions: Transaction Abuse Defense addresses critical challenges faced by online businesses by: - Reducing Financial Losses: By stopping automated fraudulent transactions, it minimizes chargebacks, processing costs, and refund fees. - Enhancing Customer Trust: Ensures product availability and a smooth purchasing process, fostering customer satisfaction and loyalty. - Improving Operational Efficiency: By mitigating bot traffic before it reaches application servers, it optimizes infrastructure costs and maintains optimal website performance. In summary, HUMAN's Transaction Abuse Defense provides a comprehensive and proactive approach to safeguarding online transactions, protecting both businesses and their customers from the detrimental effects of automated fraud.
9-Dimension Security Framework
Identity & Access Management
Compliance & Certification
AI Integration Security
NEWAPI Security
Infrastructure Security
Data Protection
Vulnerability Management
Breach History
Incident Response
AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)
Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.
Last updated: January 9, 2026 at 12:33 PM
AI Integration Security
🔒 9th DimensionAssess whether HUMAN is safe for AI agent integration. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards.
AI Readiness
Infrastructure for AI integration
AI Security
Safety controls for AI agents
Comprehensive Security Analysis
In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations
Security Analysis
Executive Summary
| Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Security Grade | D | Needs Improvement |
| Risk Level | High | Not recommended |
| Enterprise Readiness | 43% | Gaps Exist |
| Critical Gaps | 0 | None |
Security Assessment
| Category | Score | Status | Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟢 Breach History | 100/100 | excellent | Maintain current controls |
| 🟡 Vulnerability Management | 85/100 | good | Maintain current controls |
| 🟡 Data Protection | 70/100 | good | Monitor and improve gradually |
| 🟠 API Security | 60/100 | needs_improvement | Monitor and improve gradually |
| 🟠 Incident Response | 60/100 | needs_improvement | Monitor and improve gradually |
| 🟠 Infrastructure Security | 30/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
| 🟠 Identity & Access Management | 25/100 | needs_improvement | URGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately |
| 🟠 Compliance & Certification | 0/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
Overall Grade: D (33/100)
Critical Security Gaps
| Gap | Severity | Business Impact | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟡 No public security documentation or audit reports | MEDIUM | 40-80 hours of security assessment overhead | Request security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper |
Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0
Compliance Status
| Framework | Status | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| ISO 27001 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| GDPR | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| HIPAA | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
| PCI DSS | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.
Operational Excellence
| Metric | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Status Page | ❌ Not Found | N/A |
| Documentation Quality | ❌ 0/10 | No SDKs |
| SLA Commitment | ❌ None | No public SLA |
| API Versioning | ⚠️ None | No version control |
| Support Channels | ℹ️ 0 channels |
Operational Facts Extracted: 2 data points from operational_maturity enrichment
Infrastructure Security
| Infrastructure Metric | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| VirusTotal Reputation | ✅ 100/100 | 95 security engines scanned |
| SSL/TLS Certificate | ✅ Valid | Issued by Unknown |
| Certificate Expiry | ℹ️ Unknown | Regular renewal required |
| Domain Age | 🔴 0 years | Newer vendor |
Infrastructure Facts Extracted: 3 data points from virustotal_intelligence
Integration Requirements
| Aspect | Details | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Time | 3-5 days (manual setup required) | Estimated deployment timeline |
| Known Issues | Manual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls needed | Implementation considerations |
⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration
Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:
Risk Level: LOW - Contains
Compliance & Certifications
AI Integration Security Assessment
Industry-first assessment evaluating whether HUMAN is safe and ready for AI agent integration. Covers AI security controls and readiness infrastructure for Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP).
AI Integration Security
Industry-first assessment for AI agent safety
✅Excellent Security Features
- ●Data Processing Addendum page exists at /data-processing-addendum/ and GDPR topic page exists at /learn/topics/what-is-gdpr/, indicating GDPR compliance support
- ●We support pushing data to you via: Datadog, Email to Consumer, HTTP Web Hook, Splunk HTTP Event Collector (HEC), AWS S3, SumoLogic, Syslog. By adding a new integration, or selecting an existing integration, you will be routed to the integration details page
- ●Strong webhook/integration support with 7+ platforms including Datadog, Splunk, AWS S3
- ●GDPR compliance with Data Processing Addendum available
- ●Role-based access control with multiple predefined roles (Application owner, IT/Devops, Admin, User manager)
⚠️Security Gaps & Recommendations
- ●No oauth scopes
- ●No token expiration
- ●No token rotation
- ●No pii redaction
- ●No training opt out
- ●No data residency
- ●No read only tokens
- ●No action restrictions
- ●No audit logging
- ●No rate limiting
AI Integration Security evaluates whether HUMAN is safe for AI agent access. This assessment considers authentication strength, access controls, observability capabilities, and data privacy protections when APIs are accessed by AI systems like Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, or custom AI agents.
AI Readiness Assessment
Evaluates readiness for AI agent integration
Official or community MCP server support
API docs, SDKs, code examples
API reference, auth flows, error handling
MCP Server Available
HUMAN supports Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) for secure AI agent integration.
💡Recommendations
- →❌ Poor AI readiness - not recommended for AI workflows
AI Readiness measures whether HUMANprovides the infrastructure and developer resources necessary for secure AI agent integration. High readiness indicates official MCP server support, comprehensive API documentation, and developer-friendly tools.
API Intelligence
Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for HUMAN.
API Intelligence
No public API documentation found. This vendor may not offer a public API.
No API Found
We didn't find public API documentation for this vendor. Many SaaS vendors, especially SMB-focused tools, don't offer public REST APIs. This is normal and not a data quality issue.
Note: Not all SaaS vendors offer public APIs. This is completely normal, especially for SMB-focused tools. It doesn't affect the security assessment.
AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis
LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.
Security Posture & Operational Capabilities
Comprehensive assessment of HUMAN's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.
Operational Data Not Yet Assessed
We haven't collected operational maturity data for HUMAN yet.
Security Automation APIs
Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls
API Documentation
View complete API reference for HUMAN
Data confidence: 60% • Assessed from API documentation and developer portal analysis
Compare with Alternatives
How does HUMAN stack up against similar applications in Security & Compliance? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.
| Application | Overall ScoreScore↓ | Grade | AI Security 🤖AI 🤖⇅ | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
44/100🏆 | C | N/A | View ProfileView | |
43/100 | C | N/A | View ProfileView | |
35/100 | D+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
HUMANCurrent | 33/100 | D | 29.5/100 | |
30/100 | D | N/A | View ProfileView | |
25/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
23/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView |
Security Comparison Insight
8 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.