Hook Security Security Assessment
Security & Compliance
With Hook Security, you can run a fully automated security awareness training program that creates a positive and healthy security culture for your company, mitigating risk while entertaining employees. Run automated phishing testing, enroll your users in effective security awareness training courses, and generate reports that actually tell you how you're doing. Come see why PsySec is the best way to train your employees
9-Dimension Security Framework
Identity & Access Management
Compliance & Certification
AI Integration Security
NEWAPI Security
Infrastructure Security
Data Protection
Vulnerability Management
Breach History
Incident Response
AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)
Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.
Last updated: January 16, 2026 at 03:24 AM
Assessment Transparency
See exactly what data backs this security assessment
Data Coverage
7/8 security categories assessed
Score based on 7 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.
Evaluation Friction
Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.
Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility
Essential Security Analysis
Based on available security assessment data
Compliance & Certifications
API Intelligence
Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Hook Security.
API Intelligence
API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.
Incomplete API Intelligence
Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.
View Vendor DocumentationAI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis
LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.
CISO
As the Chief Information Security Officer for a 5,000-employee enterprise, I find Hook Security's current security posture presents moderate risks that require careful evaluation and targeted remediation.
With an overall security score of 41, falling into the C grade category, Hook Security demonstrates mixed security maturity that raises several critical concerns. Most alarmingly, the platform shows zero scoring across all critical security dimensions - including identity access, encryption, compliance, infrastructure, and application security. This comprehensive zero-scoring suggests either significant data collection challenges or fundamental security framework gaps.
The absence of key enterprise-grade security certifications compounds these concerns. No SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, or HIPAA compliance validates the platform's security controls. The lack of documented breach history provides minimal reassurance, as it could indicate insufficient incident reporting rather than true security resilience.
The AI integration security score compounds our risk assessment, with a complete zero rating for AI readiness. Despite having API documentation, the platform demonstrates no measurable capability to secure AI interactions or protect against emerging AI-driven security threats. This represents a critical blind spot for modern enterprise technology environments.
Recommendation: Conditional approval with mandatory security enhancement requirements. Before production deployment, Hook Security must:
- Complete comprehensive third-party security assessment
- Obtain at least one enterprise-grade security certification
- Develop and demonstrate robust identity and data protection controls
- Implement documented AI security integration framework
The current security profile requires significant remediation before enterprise adoption can be responsibly considered. Extensive due diligence and vendor engagement are essential to mitigate potential organizational risk.
Security Posture & Operational Capabilities
Comprehensive assessment of Hook Security's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.
Operational Data Not Yet Assessed
We haven't collected operational maturity data for Hook Security yet.
Security Automation APIs
Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Hook Security
Hook Security receives a security posture score of 41/100, ranking in the C grade category. This assessment reveals significant opportunities for security enhancement across multiple critical dimensions. While the platform demonstrates strong vulnerability management (85/100) and an unblemished breach history (100/100), key areas require substantial improvement. Identity and Access Management shows moderate performance at 65/100, whereas Infrastructure Security presents a notable vulnerability with a low 20/100 score. The platform's API Security registers at 50/100, indicating moderate protection levels. Concerning compliance, Hook Security currently lacks formal certifications, which represents a critical gap in their security framework. The Data Protection dimension scores 45/100, suggesting potential risks in data handling practices. Security decision-makers should carefully review these findings, particularly the Infrastructure Security and Compliance gaps. For a comprehensive understanding of Hook Security's security landscape, refer to the Security Dimensions section on our detailed assessment page.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Hook Security demonstrates a mixed security profile with an overall C-grade security score of 41/100, revealing significant opportunities for security enhancement. The platform shows notable strengths in Vulnerability Management (85/100) and a pristine Breach History (100/100), indicating robust historical security practices. However, critical security dimensions require substantial improvement, particularly Infrastructure Security (20/100) and Compliance & Certification (0/100), which represent significant potential risks. Identity & Access Management presents a moderate score of 65/100, suggesting partial implementation of robust access controls. While Incident Response scores 60/100, the platform's API Security stands at a middling 50/100, and Data Protection registers at 45/100. Security decision-makers should carefully evaluate these dimensional scores, focusing on addressing Infrastructure Security and Compliance gaps. For comprehensive insights, refer to the Security Dimensions section for a detailed security assessment breakdown.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Hook Security has a security score of 41/100, indicating moderate security risks for financial data management. While the platform demonstrates strong vulnerability management and an unblemished breach history, critical security dimensions require significant improvement. The Identity & Access Management scores 65/100, offering basic protection but lacking comprehensive safeguards. API Security rates at 50/100, suggesting potential integration vulnerabilities, and Infrastructure Security scores a concerning 20/100, which could expose financial data to potential risks.
Financial teams should exercise caution, implementing additional security layers if adopting Hook Security. The platform's Vulnerability Management dimension stands out with an 85/100 score, providing some reassurance. However, the complete absence of Compliance & Certification scores raises red flags for regulated financial environments. Security professionals are recommended to conduct thorough due diligence and request detailed security documentation before processing sensitive financial transactions.
See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive security assessment breakdown.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Hook Security's infrastructure demonstrates moderate security capabilities with an overall security score of 41/100, placing it in the C grade category. The platform shows notable strengths in vulnerability management (85/100) and a clean breach history, but significant improvements are needed across multiple security dimensions. Identity and Access Management scores 65/100, indicating partial implementation of robust access controls. However, critical areas like Infrastructure Security (20/100) and Compliance & Certification (0/100) reveal substantial security gaps that require immediate attention. API Security performs at a moderate 50/100, suggesting basic protections are in place. The platform's incident response capabilities rate at 60/100, signaling room for enhancement in detecting and managing potential security events. Security decision-makers should carefully evaluate these metrics and consider additional security measures to strengthen Hook Security's infrastructure. See the Security Dimensions section on the vendor page for a comprehensive breakdown of these assessments.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Hook Security receives a C-grade security assessment with an overall score of 41/100, presenting significant enterprise risk considerations. Organizations should exercise caution before approving this platform for sensitive workflows. Critical compliance gaps include missing certifications in SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS standards - essential benchmarks for enterprise-grade security.
The relatively low security score signals potential vulnerabilities that could compromise data protection and regulatory adherence. Security teams must conduct thorough due diligence, carefully evaluating the platform's specific security controls and risk mitigation strategies. While Hook Security may offer valuable functionality, the security assessment suggests substantial risk exposure.
Recommended next steps include requesting a comprehensive security audit from the vendor, reviewing their most recent security documentation, and comparing their controls against your organization's specific compliance and risk management requirements. See the Security Dimensions section for a detailed breakdown of our evaluation methodology.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Compare with Alternatives
How does Hook Security stack up against similar applications in Security & Compliance? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.
| Application | Overall ScoreScore↓ | Grade | AI Security 🤖AI 🤖⇅ | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
44/100🏆 | C | N/A | View ProfileView | |
43/100 | C | N/A | View ProfileView | |
Hook SecurityCurrent | 41/100 | C | 14.8/100 | |
35/100 | D+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
30/100 | D | N/A | View ProfileView | |
25/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
23/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView |
Security Comparison Insight
5 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.