Skip to main content
fusiondirectory.org logo

fusiondirectory.org Security Assessment

Security & Compliance

FusionDirectory provides a simplified interface for identity management while being extensible. The scalability of the solution, 50 plugins at the moment, fine grained acl's and its daily management features make it a software that adapts to all types of companies. Its simple handling makes it a useful tool for the secretary to the system administrator. Its API allows you to write new plugins to extend its functionality and match your needs. The Rest webservice allow the creation of identity man

SECURITY VERIFIED • SAASPOSTURE • JAN 2026
F
Bottom 20%
fusiondirectory.org logofusiondirectory.org
SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .
25
Overall Score
Weighted average across all dimensions
F
Security Grade
Critical
65% confidence

Identity & Access Management

F
Score:0
Weight:33%
Grade:F (Critical)

Compliance & Certification

F
Score:0
Weight:19%
Grade:F (Critical)

AI Integration Security

NEW
N/A
Score:0
Weight:12%
Grade:N/A

API Security

B
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:B (Top 25%)

Infrastructure Security

D
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

Data Protection

D+
Score:0
Weight:10%
Grade:D+ (Below Avg)

Vulnerability Management

F
Score:0
Weight:3%
Grade:F (Critical)

Breach History

A+
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

A
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A (Top 10%)
🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 16, 2026 at 07:00 AM

Comprehensive Security Analysis

In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations

Security Analysis

Executive Summary

MetricValueAssessment
Security GradeFNeeds Improvement
Risk LevelHighNot recommended
Enterprise Readiness40%Gaps Exist
Critical Gaps0None

Security Assessment

CategoryScoreStatusAction Required
🟢 Breach History100/100excellentMaintain current controls
🟠 Incident Response60/100needs_improvementMonitor and improve gradually
🟠 API Security50/100needs_improvementAdd rate limiting and authentication
🟠 Data Protection35/100needs_improvementImplement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more
🟠 Infrastructure Security30/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 Identity & Access Management25/100needs_improvementURGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately
🟠 Compliance & Certification0/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 Vulnerability Management0/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls

Overall Grade: F (25/100)

Critical Security Gaps

GapSeverityBusiness ImpactRecommendation
🟡 No public security documentation or audit reportsMEDIUM40-80 hours of security assessment overheadRequest security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper

Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0

Compliance Status

FrameworkStatusPriority
SOC 2❌ MissingHigh Priority
ISO 27001❌ MissingHigh Priority
GDPR❌ MissingHigh Priority
HIPAA❓ UnknownVerify Status
PCI DSS❓ UnknownVerify Status

Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.

Operational Excellence

MetricStatusDetails
Status Page❌ Not FoundN/A
Documentation Quality❌ 0/10No SDKs
SLA Commitment✅ PublishedFormal SLA available
API Versioning⚠️ NoneNo version control
Support Channelsℹ️ 1 channelsEmail

Operational Facts Extracted: 5 data points from operational_maturity enrichment

Integration Requirements

AspectDetailsNotes
Setup Time3-5 days (manual setup required)Estimated deployment timeline
Known IssuesManual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls neededImplementation considerations

⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration

Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:

Risk Level: LOW - Contains

Compliance & Certifications

0
Active
0
Pending
6
Not Certified

API Intelligence

Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for fusiondirectory.org.

API Intelligence

No API Found

No public API documentation found. This vendor may not offer a public API.

No API Found

We didn't find public API documentation for this vendor. Many SaaS vendors, especially SMB-focused tools, don't offer public REST APIs. This is normal and not a data quality issue.

Note: Not all SaaS vendors offer public APIs. This is completely normal, especially for SMB-focused tools. It doesn't affect the security assessment.

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of fusiondirectory.org's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Maturity

Support, SLAs, and documentation quality

Support Channels

📧
Email Support
🤖

Security Automation APIs

Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls

Compare with Alternatives

How does fusiondirectory.org stack up against similar applications in Security & Compliance? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application
Score
Grade
AI 🤖
Action
44🏆
CN/AView
43
CN/AView
35
D+N/AView
30
DN/AView
25
FN/A
25
FN/AView
23
FN/AView
💡

Security Comparison Insight

16 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.