Fingerprint Security Assessment
Security & Compliance
As opposed to top-down, enterprise-focused fraud prevention platforms, FingerprintJS prevents digital fraud by uniquely and accurately identifying users, and empowering technical teams to use that data in a way that works for their applications.
9-Dimension Security Framework
Identity & Access Management
Compliance & Certification
AI Integration Security
NEWAPI Security
Infrastructure Security
Data Protection
Vulnerability Management
Breach History
Incident Response
AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)
Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.
Last updated: January 16, 2026 at 05:47 AM
Assessment Transparency
See exactly what data backs this security assessment
Data Coverage
6/8 security categories assessed
Score based on 6 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.
Evaluation Friction
Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.
Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility
AI Integration Security
🔒 9th DimensionAssess whether Fingerprint is safe for AI agent integration. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards.
AI Readiness
Infrastructure for AI integration
AI Security
Safety controls for AI agents
Comprehensive Security Analysis
In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations
Security Analysis
Executive Summary
| Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Security Grade | A | Needs Improvement |
| Risk Level | Medium | Implement controls |
| Enterprise Readiness | 55% | Gaps Exist |
| Critical Gaps | 0 | None |
Security Assessment
| Category | Score | Status | Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟢 Breach History | 100/100 | excellent | Maintain current controls |
| 🟡 Vulnerability Management | 85/100 | good | Maintain current controls |
| 🟡 API Security | 80/100 | good | Maintain current controls |
| 🟡 Identity & Access Management | 75/100 | good | Monitor and improve gradually |
| 🟠 Data Protection | 60/100 | needs_improvement | Monitor and improve gradually |
| 🟠 Incident Response | 60/100 | needs_improvement | Monitor and improve gradually |
| 🟠 Infrastructure Security | 50/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
| 🟠 Compliance & Certification | 35/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
Overall Grade: A (63/100)
Critical Security Gaps
| Gap | Severity | Business Impact | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟢 No dedicated security documentation page | LOW | Extended due diligence process | Request security whitepaper or public audit reports |
Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0
Compliance Status
| Framework | Status | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| ISO 27001 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| GDPR | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| HIPAA | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
| PCI DSS | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.
Operational Excellence
| Metric | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Status Page | ✅ Available | https://status.fingerprint.com |
| Documentation Quality | ✅ 10/10 | javascript, java, go, rust |
| SLA Commitment | ✅ Published | Formal SLA available |
| API Versioning | ✅ Yes | Breaking changes managed |
| Support Channels | ℹ️ 2 channels | Email, Chat |
Operational Facts Extracted: 10 data points from operational_maturity enrichment
Integration Requirements
| Aspect | Details | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Time | 3-5 days (manual setup required) | Estimated deployment timeline |
| Known Issues | Manual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls needed | Implementation considerations |
Authentication Capabilities
| Method | Tier Requirement | Evidence Source |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ SSO (SAML/OAuth) | Enterprise | sso_discovery (90% confidence) |
Authentication Facts Extracted: 0 data points from auth_evidence enrichment
🏆 Why Fingerprint Earns Top 10% Security Rating
Fingerprint demonstrates exceptional security practices across multiple dimensions:
Operational Excellence
- ✅ Public status page available at https://status.fingerprint.com (operational_excellence_enricher)
- ✅ Developer documentation quality: 10/10 with 10 quality indicators (getting_started, api_reference, code_examples, sdks, guides...) (operational_excellence_enricher)
- ✅ Official SDKs available for 4 languages: javascript, java, go, rust (operational_excellence_enricher)
- ✅ Email support verified available (operational_excellence_enricher)
- ✅ Chat support verified available (operational_excellence_enricher)
Security Category Excellence
- ✅ Breach History: 100/100 - excellent
- ✅ Vulnerability Management: 85/100 - good
- ✅ API Security: 80/100 - good
📊 Areas for Improvement
Data Protection: 60/100 - needs_improvement
Recommendation: Conduct detailed assessment of Data Protection practices to improve from 60/100.
General Actions:
- Request vendor documentation specific to Data Protection
- Compare against industry benchmarks and best practices
- Identify specific gaps through security questionnaire
- Evaluate impact on your organization's risk profile
- Consider contractual requirements or remediation timeline
Incident Response: 60/100 - needs_improvement
What This Means: The vendor has disclosed security incidents that impacted their breach history score.
Actionable Recommendations:
- Request detailed incident post-mortems and remediation evidence
- Verify security improvements implemented since last incident
- Implement additional monitoring for early breach detection
- Review vendor's incident response SLAs in your contract
- Consider cyber insurance requirements for vendor breaches
- Evaluate vendor's incident notification timeline vs. your compliance requirements
Infrastructure Security: 50/100 - needs_improvement
Recommendation: Conduct detailed assessment of Infrastructure Security practices to improve from 50/100.
General Actions:
- Request vendor documentation specific to Infrastructure Security
- Compare against industry benchmarks and best practices
- Identify specific gaps through security questionnaire
- Evaluate impact on your organization's risk profile
- Consider contractual requirements or remediation timeline
Compliance & Certification: 35/100 - needs_improvement
What This Means: Missing or incomplete compliance certifications.
Actionable Recommendations:
- Request vendor's compliance roadmap and timeline
- Verify which certifications are in progress vs. not planned
- Consider contractual requirements for certification completion
- Evaluate risk of deploying before certifications are achieved
- Request audit reports for completed certifications
- Review vendor's compliance attestation process
⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration
Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:
Risk Level: LOW - Contains
🛡️ Enterprise Security Controls to Implement
Even with strong vendor security, enterprises must implement:
1. Identity & Access Management
- Enable SSO with your identity provider
- Implement MFA for all user accounts
- Regular access reviews (quarterly recommended)
Compliance & Certifications
AI Integration Security Assessment
Industry-first assessment evaluating whether Fingerprint is safe and ready for AI agent integration. Covers AI security controls and readiness infrastructure for Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP).
AI Integration Security
Industry-first assessment for AI agent safety
✅Excellent Security Features
- ●Rotate encryption key post, Revert encryption key rotation post - encryption key rotation is supported via Management API
- ●Fingerprint supports the following regions: Global (US) - Northern Virginia, USA; EU - Frankfurt, Germany; Asia - Mumbai, India. Your data never leaves the chosen region.
- ●GDPR and CCPA compliant. DPA (GDPR) and DPA (US SPL) documents available. Fingerprint Identification is also GDPR compliant... Fingerprint Identification is a data processor.
- ●You have the ability to fine tune user access by customizing both account permissions, and permissions for each workspace. Standard roles: Viewer, Editor, Billing Admin, Administrator.
- ●Request filtering for websites, mobile applications, Search bot request filtering, AI bot request filtering, Network request filtering - extensive filtering rules to block dangerous operations
- ●DRN API is rate limited. The limit is enforced for every Secret API key, and the default rate limit per API key is 5 req/sec. If you need a higher limit, reach out to support.
- ●Webhooks are a form of server-to-server communication allowing Fingerprint to send data to your application's API endpoint every time we identify a visitor. When multiple webhooks are enabled, events are delivered to each of them simultaneously.
- ●SOC 2 Type II compliant
- ●Penetration testing - Fingerprint undergoes comprehensive penetration and vulnerability testing on a yearly basis to ensure the compliance and security of our infrastructure.
- ●SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certified
⚠️Security Gaps & Recommendations
- ●No oauth scopes
- ●No token expiration
- ●No service accounts
- ●No mfa enforcement
- ●No training opt out
- ●No audit logging
- ●No OAuth scopes - simple API key authentication only
- ●No documented token expiration or configurable lifetimes
- ●No MFA enforcement for API access
AI Integration Security evaluates whether Fingerprint is safe for AI agent access. This assessment considers authentication strength, access controls, observability capabilities, and data privacy protections when APIs are accessed by AI systems like Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, or custom AI agents.
AI Readiness Assessment
Evaluates readiness for AI agent integration
Official or community MCP server support
API docs, SDKs, code examples
API reference, auth flows, error handling
MCP Server Available (With Warnings)
community⚠️ Only high-risk MCP servers found - not recommended
Fingerprint has MCP server support, but with security concerns.
💡Recommendations
- →❌ Poor AI readiness - not recommended for AI workflows
AI Readiness measures whether Fingerprintprovides the infrastructure and developer resources necessary for secure AI agent integration. High readiness indicates official MCP server support, comprehensive API documentation, and developer-friendly tools.
API Intelligence
Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Fingerprint.
API Intelligence
API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.
Incomplete API Intelligence
Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.
View Vendor DocumentationAI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis
LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.
Security Posture & Operational Capabilities
Comprehensive assessment of Fingerprint's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.
Operational Maturity
Support, SLAs, and documentation quality
Support Channels
SLA Commitment
Documentation Quality
100% • ExcellentResources
Authentication Data Not Yet Assessed
We haven't collected authentication and authorization data for Fingerprint yet.
Security Automation APIs
Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls
Compare with Alternatives
How does Fingerprint stack up against similar applications in Security & Compliance? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.
| Application | Overall ScoreScore↓ | Grade | AI Security 🤖AI 🤖⇅ | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FingerprintCurrent | 63/100🏆 | A | 59.5/100 | |
44/100 | C | N/A | View ProfileView | |
43/100 | C | N/A | View ProfileView | |
35/100 | D+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
30/100 | D | N/A | View ProfileView | |
25/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
23/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView |
Security Comparison Insight
1 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.