Skip to main content
ZWSOFT logo

ZWSOFT Security Assessment

Creative & Design

ZWCAD is a powerful, reliable, and DWG-compatible CAD solution that enables you to boost design efficiency without switching cost.

Data: 3/8(38%)
SECURITY VERIFIED • SAASPOSTURE • JAN 2026
F
Bottom 20%
ZWSOFT logoZWSOFT
SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .
29
Overall Score
Weighted average across all dimensions
F
Security Grade
Critical
65% confidence

Identity & Access Management

F
Score:0
Weight:33%
Grade:F (Critical)

Compliance & Certification

F
Score:0
Weight:19%
Grade:F (Critical)

AI Integration Security

NEW
N/A
Score:0
Weight:12%
Grade:N/A

API Security

D
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

Infrastructure Security

B
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:B (Top 25%)

Data Protection

B+
Score:0
Weight:10%
Grade:B+ (Top 25%)

Vulnerability Management

A+
Score:0
Weight:3%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Breach History

A+
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

A
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A (Top 10%)
🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 08:46 AM

Assessment Transparency

See exactly what data backs this security assessment

Data Coverage

3/8 security categories assessed

38%
complete
Identity & Access
Available
Compliance
Missing
API Security
Available
Infrastructure
Available
Data Protection
Missing
Vulnerability Mgmt
Missing
Incident Response
Missing
Breach History
Missing

Score based on 3 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.

Evaluation Friction

UNKNOWN
Estimated: Unknown
0% public documentation accessibility

Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.

14 data sources successful

Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility

Comprehensive Security Analysis

In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations

Security Analysis

Executive Summary

MetricValueAssessment
Security GradeFNeeds Improvement
Risk LevelHighNot recommended
Enterprise Readiness42%Gaps Exist
Critical Gaps0None

Security Assessment

CategoryScoreStatusAction Required
🟢 Breach History100/100excellentMaintain current controls
🟡 Vulnerability Management85/100goodMaintain current controls
🟠 Incident Response60/100needs_improvementMonitor and improve gradually
🟠 Data Protection55/100needs_improvementImplement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more
🟠 Infrastructure Security50/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 API Security30/100needs_improvementAdd rate limiting and authentication
🟠 Identity & Access Management25/100needs_improvementURGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately
🟠 Compliance & Certification0/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls

Overall Grade: F (29/100)

Critical Security Gaps

GapSeverityBusiness ImpactRecommendation
🟢 No dedicated security documentation pageLOWExtended due diligence processRequest security whitepaper or public audit reports

Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0

Compliance Status

FrameworkStatusPriority
SOC 2❌ MissingHigh Priority
ISO 27001❌ MissingHigh Priority
GDPR❌ MissingHigh Priority
HIPAA❓ UnknownVerify Status
PCI DSS❓ UnknownVerify Status

Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.

Operational Excellence

MetricStatusDetails
Status Page❌ Not FoundN/A
Documentation Quality❌ 0/10No SDKs
SLA Commitment✅ PublishedFormal SLA available
API Versioning✅ YesBreaking changes managed
Support Channelsℹ️ 0 channels

Operational Facts Extracted: 4 data points from operational_maturity enrichment

Integration Requirements

AspectDetailsNotes
Setup Time3-5 days (manual setup required)Estimated deployment timeline
Known IssuesManual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls neededImplementation considerations

Authentication Capabilities

MethodTier RequirementEvidence Source
❌ OAuth 2.0All Tiersauth_discovery (90% confidence)

Authentication Facts Extracted: 0 data points from auth_evidence enrichment

⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration

Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:

Risk Level: LOW - Contains

Compliance & Certifications

0
Active
0
Pending
6
Not Certified

API Intelligence

Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for ZWSOFT.

API Intelligence

Incomplete

API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.

Incomplete API Intelligence

Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.

View Vendor Documentation

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of ZWSOFT's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Maturity

Support, SLAs, and documentation quality

🔐

Authentication Data Not Yet Assessed

We haven't collected authentication and authorization data for ZWSOFT yet.

🤖

Security Automation APIs

Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ZWSOFT

ZWSOFT's security assessment reveals significant vulnerabilities, with an overall security score of 29/100 and an "F" grade. Critical security dimensions demonstrate substantial room for improvement, particularly in Compliance & Certification (0/100) and Identity & Access Management (25/100). While the platform shows isolated strengths like strong Vulnerability Management (85/100) and no recorded breach history, enterprise security teams should exercise substantial caution. The API Security score of 30/100 and marginal Infrastructure Security at 50/100 indicate potential risks in integrating or deploying ZWSOFT solutions. Data Protection performs slightly better at 55/100, but still falls below recommended security standards. Security decision-makers should conduct thorough due diligence, implement additional compensating controls, and carefully evaluate potential security risks before adoption. See Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of ZWSOFT's security posture.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

ZWSOFT's security assessment reveals significant vulnerabilities across multiple critical dimensions. With an overall security score of 29/100 and an "F" grade, the platform demonstrates substantial security improvement opportunities. Identity and Access Management stands out as a primary concern, scoring only 25/100, indicating potential risks in user authentication and access controls. The platform's compliance landscape is particularly problematic, registering zero points in Compliance & Certification, which suggests potential regulatory and standardization gaps. While ZWSOFT demonstrates strengths in Breach History and Vulnerability Management, these represent minimal weighted components of their security profile. API Security (30/100) and Infrastructure Security (50/100) further underscore systemic security challenges. Data Protection achieves a moderate 55/100, signaling moderate data handling practices. Security decision-makers should conduct thorough due diligence and engage directly with ZWSOFT to understand and mitigate these comprehensive security limitations. See Security Dimensions section for detailed breakdown.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

ZWSOFT's overall security posture presents significant risks for financial data management, with a low security score of 29/100 and an F grade that signals critical vulnerabilities. The platform demonstrates substantial weaknesses across key security dimensions, particularly in Compliance & Certification, where it scores 0/100, and Identity & Access Management at just 25/100. While the platform shows strengths in Vulnerability Management (85/100) and an unblemished Breach History, these isolated positives cannot compensate for fundamental security deficiencies. Financial teams considering ZWSOFT should exercise extreme caution, conducting thorough independent security assessments before potential integration. The marginal infrastructure security score of 50/100 and limited data protection capabilities (55/100) further underscore potential risks. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of ZWSOFT's security profile, and consider alternative solutions with more robust financial data protection mechanisms.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

ZWSOFT demonstrates significant security authentication weaknesses with a low Identity & Access Management score of 25/100, signaling critical gaps in login security protocols. The overall security grade of F (29/100) underscores substantial risks in authentication infrastructure. While specific authentication methods are not explicitly defined, the platform's minimal Identity & Access Management performance suggests limited multi-factor authentication (MFA) support and potential vulnerabilities in user access controls. Security professionals should exercise extreme caution, particularly given the near-zero Compliance & Certification score. The Infrastructure Security score of 50 and API Security score of 30 further indicate potential entry points for unauthorized access. Organizations considering ZWSOFT should conduct comprehensive security assessments, implement additional protective measures, and closely monitor user authentication processes. See the Security Dimensions section for a detailed breakdown of ZWSOFT's authentication and access management challenges.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

ZWSOFT presents significant enterprise security risks with a critically low security score of 29/100, indicating substantial vulnerabilities that make it unsuitable for organizational adoption. The platform fails critical enterprise compliance standards, lacking essential certifications like SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS. For security-conscious organizations, these compliance gaps represent major potential exposure points in data protection and regulatory adherence. Decision-makers should exercise extreme caution and conduct thorough independent security assessments before considering ZWSOFT for any enterprise environment. The platform's F-grade security rating signals fundamental security weaknesses that could compromise sensitive corporate data and introduce unacceptable risk profiles. Organizations prioritizing robust security and regulatory compliance should seek alternative solutions with demonstrably stronger security postures and comprehensive certification frameworks. See Security Dimensions section for comprehensive risk analysis and detailed security evaluation metrics.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Compare with Alternatives

How does ZWSOFT stack up against similar applications in Creative & Design? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application
Score
Grade
AI 🤖
Action
53🏆
BN/AView
31
DN/AView
ZWSOFTCurrent
29
FN/A
27
FN/AView
23
FN/AView
22
FN/AView
22
FN/AView
💡

Security Comparison Insight

12 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.