ZWSOFT Security Assessment
Creative & Design
ZWCAD is a powerful, reliable, and DWG-compatible CAD solution that enables you to boost design efficiency without switching cost.
9-Dimension Security Framework
Identity & Access Management
Compliance & Certification
AI Integration Security
NEWAPI Security
Infrastructure Security
Data Protection
Vulnerability Management
Breach History
Incident Response
AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)
Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.
Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 08:46 AM
Assessment Transparency
See exactly what data backs this security assessment
Data Coverage
3/8 security categories assessed
Score based on 3 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.
Evaluation Friction
Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.
Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility
Comprehensive Security Analysis
In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations
Security Analysis
Executive Summary
| Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Security Grade | F | Needs Improvement |
| Risk Level | High | Not recommended |
| Enterprise Readiness | 42% | Gaps Exist |
| Critical Gaps | 0 | None |
Security Assessment
| Category | Score | Status | Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟢 Breach History | 100/100 | excellent | Maintain current controls |
| 🟡 Vulnerability Management | 85/100 | good | Maintain current controls |
| 🟠 Incident Response | 60/100 | needs_improvement | Monitor and improve gradually |
| 🟠 Data Protection | 55/100 | needs_improvement | Implement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more |
| 🟠 Infrastructure Security | 50/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
| 🟠 API Security | 30/100 | needs_improvement | Add rate limiting and authentication |
| 🟠 Identity & Access Management | 25/100 | needs_improvement | URGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately |
| 🟠 Compliance & Certification | 0/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
Overall Grade: F (29/100)
Critical Security Gaps
| Gap | Severity | Business Impact | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟢 No dedicated security documentation page | LOW | Extended due diligence process | Request security whitepaper or public audit reports |
Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0
Compliance Status
| Framework | Status | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| ISO 27001 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| GDPR | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| HIPAA | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
| PCI DSS | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.
Operational Excellence
| Metric | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Status Page | ❌ Not Found | N/A |
| Documentation Quality | ❌ 0/10 | No SDKs |
| SLA Commitment | ✅ Published | Formal SLA available |
| API Versioning | ✅ Yes | Breaking changes managed |
| Support Channels | ℹ️ 0 channels |
Operational Facts Extracted: 4 data points from operational_maturity enrichment
Integration Requirements
| Aspect | Details | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Time | 3-5 days (manual setup required) | Estimated deployment timeline |
| Known Issues | Manual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls needed | Implementation considerations |
Authentication Capabilities
| Method | Tier Requirement | Evidence Source |
|---|---|---|
| ❌ OAuth 2.0 | All Tiers | auth_discovery (90% confidence) |
Authentication Facts Extracted: 0 data points from auth_evidence enrichment
⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration
Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:
Risk Level: LOW - Contains
Compliance & Certifications
API Intelligence
Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for ZWSOFT.
API Intelligence
API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.
Incomplete API Intelligence
Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.
View Vendor DocumentationAI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis
LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.
Security Posture & Operational Capabilities
Comprehensive assessment of ZWSOFT's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.
Operational Maturity
Support, SLAs, and documentation quality
Authentication Data Not Yet Assessed
We haven't collected authentication and authorization data for ZWSOFT yet.
Security Automation APIs
Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ZWSOFT
ZWSOFT's security assessment reveals significant vulnerabilities, with an overall security score of 29/100 and an "F" grade. Critical security dimensions demonstrate substantial room for improvement, particularly in Compliance & Certification (0/100) and Identity & Access Management (25/100). While the platform shows isolated strengths like strong Vulnerability Management (85/100) and no recorded breach history, enterprise security teams should exercise substantial caution. The API Security score of 30/100 and marginal Infrastructure Security at 50/100 indicate potential risks in integrating or deploying ZWSOFT solutions. Data Protection performs slightly better at 55/100, but still falls below recommended security standards. Security decision-makers should conduct thorough due diligence, implement additional compensating controls, and carefully evaluate potential security risks before adoption. See Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of ZWSOFT's security posture.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
ZWSOFT's security assessment reveals significant vulnerabilities across multiple critical dimensions. With an overall security score of 29/100 and an "F" grade, the platform demonstrates substantial security improvement opportunities. Identity and Access Management stands out as a primary concern, scoring only 25/100, indicating potential risks in user authentication and access controls. The platform's compliance landscape is particularly problematic, registering zero points in Compliance & Certification, which suggests potential regulatory and standardization gaps. While ZWSOFT demonstrates strengths in Breach History and Vulnerability Management, these represent minimal weighted components of their security profile. API Security (30/100) and Infrastructure Security (50/100) further underscore systemic security challenges. Data Protection achieves a moderate 55/100, signaling moderate data handling practices. Security decision-makers should conduct thorough due diligence and engage directly with ZWSOFT to understand and mitigate these comprehensive security limitations. See Security Dimensions section for detailed breakdown.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
ZWSOFT's overall security posture presents significant risks for financial data management, with a low security score of 29/100 and an F grade that signals critical vulnerabilities. The platform demonstrates substantial weaknesses across key security dimensions, particularly in Compliance & Certification, where it scores 0/100, and Identity & Access Management at just 25/100. While the platform shows strengths in Vulnerability Management (85/100) and an unblemished Breach History, these isolated positives cannot compensate for fundamental security deficiencies. Financial teams considering ZWSOFT should exercise extreme caution, conducting thorough independent security assessments before potential integration. The marginal infrastructure security score of 50/100 and limited data protection capabilities (55/100) further underscore potential risks. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of ZWSOFT's security profile, and consider alternative solutions with more robust financial data protection mechanisms.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
ZWSOFT demonstrates significant security authentication weaknesses with a low Identity & Access Management score of 25/100, signaling critical gaps in login security protocols. The overall security grade of F (29/100) underscores substantial risks in authentication infrastructure. While specific authentication methods are not explicitly defined, the platform's minimal Identity & Access Management performance suggests limited multi-factor authentication (MFA) support and potential vulnerabilities in user access controls. Security professionals should exercise extreme caution, particularly given the near-zero Compliance & Certification score. The Infrastructure Security score of 50 and API Security score of 30 further indicate potential entry points for unauthorized access. Organizations considering ZWSOFT should conduct comprehensive security assessments, implement additional protective measures, and closely monitor user authentication processes. See the Security Dimensions section for a detailed breakdown of ZWSOFT's authentication and access management challenges.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
ZWSOFT presents significant enterprise security risks with a critically low security score of 29/100, indicating substantial vulnerabilities that make it unsuitable for organizational adoption. The platform fails critical enterprise compliance standards, lacking essential certifications like SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS. For security-conscious organizations, these compliance gaps represent major potential exposure points in data protection and regulatory adherence. Decision-makers should exercise extreme caution and conduct thorough independent security assessments before considering ZWSOFT for any enterprise environment. The platform's F-grade security rating signals fundamental security weaknesses that could compromise sensitive corporate data and introduce unacceptable risk profiles. Organizations prioritizing robust security and regulatory compliance should seek alternative solutions with demonstrably stronger security postures and comprehensive certification frameworks. See Security Dimensions section for comprehensive risk analysis and detailed security evaluation metrics.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Compare with Alternatives
How does ZWSOFT stack up against similar applications in Creative & Design? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.
| Application | Overall ScoreScore↓ | Grade | AI Security 🤖AI 🤖⇅ | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
53/100🏆 | B | N/A | View ProfileView | |
31/100 | D | N/A | View ProfileView | |
ZWSOFTCurrent | 29/100 | F | N/A | |
27/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
23/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
22/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
22/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView |
Security Comparison Insight
12 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.