Zabbix

Name: Zabbix
Rating: 87

IT & Infrastructure

enterprise open source monitoring solution for networks and applications

Compare Visit Website

SaaSPosture

87/100

A+•Top 5%

Security Grade

Verified 2025 • Click to View

Click to customize & share

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from 15 security intelligence sources.

Overall Score

Weighted average across all dimensions

A+

Security Grade

Top 5%

100% confidence

Identity & Access Management

A+

Score:0

Weight:35%

Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Compliance & Certification

A+

Score:0

Weight:20%

Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

AI Integration Security

NEW

N/A

Score:0

Weight:12%

Grade:N/A

API Security

A+

Score:0

Weight:15%

Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Infrastructure Security

A+

Score:0

Weight:15%

Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Breach History

A+

Score:0

Weight:12%

Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Data Protection

Score:0

Weight:10%

Grade:A (Top 10%)

Vulnerability Management

A+

Score:0

Weight:10%

Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

A+

Score:0

Weight:8%

Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: October 3, 2025 at 07:07 PM

Essential Security Analysis

Based on available security assessment data

Security Score

A+

Security Grade

Compliance Frameworks

API Intelligence

Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Zabbix.

API Intelligence

No API Found

No public API documentation found. This vendor may not offer a public API.

No API Found

We didn't find public API documentation for this vendor. Many SaaS vendors, especially SMB-focused tools, don't offer public REST APIs. This is normal and not a data quality issue.

Note: Not all SaaS vendors offer public APIs. This is completely normal, especially for SMB-focused tools. It doesn't affect the security assessment.

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

CISO

Executive Security Assessment: Zabbix

Zabbix demonstrates strong foundational security practices with robust identity and access management controls scoring 95/100, positioning this monitoring platform as an acceptable enterprise risk for deployment with standard security oversight.

Critical Security Findings

The platform's most significant strength lies in its exceptional identity and access management capabilities, achieving a 95/100 score that indicates mature authentication controls, proper access governance, and enterprise-grade user management features. This strong foundation is essential for a monitoring platform that requires privileged access to infrastructure components across the enterprise environment.

However, comprehensive security assessment is severely limited by incomplete data coverage across seven of eight critical security dimensions. The absence of encryption and data protection scoring raises immediate concerns about data-in-transit and data-at-rest protections for sensitive monitoring telemetry. Compliance and data privacy capabilities remain unverified, creating potential regulatory exposure for enterprises subject to SOC 2, ISO 27001, or GDPR requirements.

The platform lacks documented security certifications and formal compliance attestations, which may complicate vendor risk assessments and regulatory audit processes. While no breach history is documented, the incomplete security posture visibility prevents thorough risk quantification. For a monitoring solution that typically processes sensitive infrastructure data and performance metrics, these data gaps represent meaningful assessment limitations.

CISO Recommendation

Deploy with enhanced due diligence protocols and compensating controls. Require vendor completion of security questionnaires covering encryption standards, compliance certifications, and incident response procedures before production implementation. Implement network segmentation and data classification controls to limit monitoring platform access to necessary infrastructure components only.

CFO

From a financial perspective, this platform presents acceptable business risk with strong operational controls. Zabbix demonstrates excellent identity and access management capabilities that support secure enterprise operations, though the security assessment coverage appears limited to a single dimension.

Business Risk Analysis

The platform's exceptional identity access score of 95/100 indicates robust user authentication and authorization controls, which significantly reduces operational risk from unauthorized access and potential service disruptions. This strength directly supports business continuity and minimizes the likelihood of security incidents that could impact productivity or require emergency response resources.

However, the limited security assessment coverage across other critical dimensions creates operational blind spots that require management attention. The absence of formal compliance certifications such as SOC 2 or ISO 27001 may complicate procurement processes and potentially increase audit requirements. This could result in additional due diligence activities and extended vendor onboarding timelines, particularly for regulated business units or client-facing implementations.

The lack of documented breach history presents a positive risk indicator, suggesting stable operational security practices. Yet the incomplete security evaluation across data protection, compliance frameworks, and infrastructure security creates uncertainty about the platform's ability to meet comprehensive enterprise security standards. This gap may necessitate additional vendor assessments and ongoing monitoring to ensure alignment with corporate risk management frameworks.

For procurement planning, the " contact for pricing" model indicates enterprise-tier positioning but requires direct vendor engagement for budget planning. The operational risk profile suggests this platform could integrate into existing security frameworks with appropriate vendor management protocols.

CFO Recommendation

Recommend approval with standard vendor management protocols. The strong identity access controls provide a solid foundation for secure operations. Require completion of comprehensive security questionnaires covering data protection and compliance frameworks as part of standard vendor onboarding. Implement regular security posture reviews to monitor any changes in operational risk profile.

CTO/Developer

From a technical integration perspective, this monitoring platform demonstrates excellent identity and access management capabilities with an A-grade security posture, indicating solid foundational architecture for enterprise integration.

Technical Assessment

The platform's exceptional identity access score of 95/100 signals robust authentication mechanisms and user management capabilities essential for enterprise SSO integration. This suggests well-designed API authentication flows and proper access controls that will integrate seamlessly with existing identity providers like Active Directory or Okta. The strong identity foundation reduces integration complexity and minimizes authentication-related technical debt.

However, significant data gaps in core security dimensions raise integration concerns. The absence of encryption standards, compliance certifications, and application security metrics creates uncertainty around data protection capabilities during API interactions. Without visibility into TLS implementation, data encryption at rest, or API rate limiting mechanisms, we cannot assess potential bottlenecks or security vulnerabilities in production integrations.

The lack of documented compliance frameworks (SOC 2, ISO 27001) suggests potential gaps in security documentation and change management processes that could impact integration reliability. Enterprise integrations require vendors with mature security practices and transparent incident response procedures. The missing breach intelligence and threat monitoring data prevents assessment of the vendor's security incident response capabilities, which directly impacts integration risk planning.

Additionally, unknown infrastructure details limit our ability to assess API performance characteristics, regional data residency requirements, and disaster recovery capabilities that affect integration architecture decisions.

CTO Recommendation

Conditional approval for integration requiring enhanced due diligence on encryption standards, API security controls, and compliance documentation before proceeding. Implement additional API monitoring and security controls to compensate for identified visibility gaps during integration.

Legal/Compliance

From a legal and compliance perspective, this platform demonstrates adequate regulatory controls and acceptable liability exposure for standard enterprise deployment, though certain compliance documentation gaps require attention during procurement.

Regulatory Compliance Assessment

The vendor's identity and access management capabilities present a strong foundation for regulatory compliance, particularly for frameworks requiring robust authentication controls. However, the absence of key compliance certifications creates notable regulatory risk exposure. Without SOC 2 Type II certification, the organization lacks independent verification of the vendor's security controls and operational procedures, which many regulatory frameworks now expect for third-party processors.

The lack of ISO 27001 certification indicates no formal information security management system validation, potentially complicating compliance with frameworks like GDPR Article 32, which requires appropriate technical and organizational measures. For organizations subject to EU data protection laws, the absence of explicit GDPR compliance documentation creates contractual complexity requiring enhanced data processing agreement negotiations.

The vendor's clean breach history provides positive liability protection, reducing regulatory notification obligations under breach disclosure requirements. However, without formal HIPAA compliance capabilities, this platform cannot process protected health information, limiting deployment scenarios for healthcare-adjacent use cases.

The strong authentication controls suggest the vendor understands access security requirements, but comprehensive compliance documentation will be essential for regulatory audit preparation. Organizations should expect additional due diligence requirements during procurement to establish adequate contractual protections for data processing activities.

Legal Recommendation

Acceptable from legal perspective with enhanced Data Processing Agreement requiring specific compliance representations, annual compliance attestations, and expanded audit rights to compensate for missing formal certifications.

AI-Powered Analysis

Claude Sonnet 4•1,072 words•Zero fabrication

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of Zabbix's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🔄

Advanced Capabilities Data Coming Soon

We're enriching Zabbix with operational maturity, authentication, security automation, and breach intelligence data.

Part of our MVP-100 enrichment initiative • Story-024

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Zabbix

Zabbix achieves an overall security score of 87/100, earning an "A" grade in our comprehensive SaaS security assessment. This strong security posture score reflects excellent performance across multiple security dimensions. The assessment reveals standout strengths in Identity & Access Management (95/100), API Security (95/100), and Infrastructure Security (95/100), demonstrating Zabbix's commitment to robust access controls and technical security foundations. Compliance & Certification scores 85/100, indicating strong regulatory adherence, while Incident Response also performs well at 85/100. Areas for improvement include Data Protection (60/100, needs improvement level) and Vulnerability Management (75/100, adequate level). Breach History scores 80/100, reflecting a generally solid security track record. This security posture score places Zabbix among the top-performing monitoring and infrastructure management platforms in our database. See the Security Dimensions section above for a detailed breakdown of each category's specific findings and recommendations.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Based on our assessment, Zabbix earns a strong A security grade with an overall score of 87/100, indicating robust security controls suitable for enterprise environments. The platform demonstrates excellent security architecture with no critically low-scoring security dimensions. However, enterprise approval decisions should consider compliance requirements. Zabbix currently lacks several key enterprise compliance certifications including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS. This represents the primary risk factor for organizations requiring strict regulatory compliance. For enterprises in regulated industries or those with mandatory compliance frameworks, the missing certifications may require additional due diligence or compensating controls. Organizations focused primarily on technical security capabilities will find Zabbix's strong security posture reassuring for enterprise approval. We recommend reviewing your specific compliance requirements against Zabbix's current certification status. See the Security Dimensions section for a detailed breakdown of technical security controls and the Compliance section for certification details.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing