Skip to main content
VidCruiter logo

VidCruiter Security Assessment

HR & Talent Management

VidCruiter is a digital, mobile and video recruiting software. They specialize in applicant tracking and video interviewing making it possible to hire from anywhere at anytime.

Data: 4/8(50%)
HIGH Friction
SECURITY VERIFIED • SAASPOSTURE • JAN 2026
D
Bottom 30%
VidCruiter logoVidCruiter
SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .
38
Overall Score
Weighted average across all dimensions
D+
Security Grade
Below Avg
65% confidence

Identity & Access Management

F
Score:0
Weight:33%
Grade:F (Critical)

Compliance & Certification

A+
Score:0
Weight:19%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

AI Integration Security

NEW
N/A
Score:0
Weight:12%
Grade:N/A

API Security

B
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:B (Top 25%)

Infrastructure Security

F
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:F (Critical)

Data Protection

D
Score:0
Weight:10%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

Vulnerability Management

A+
Score:0
Weight:3%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Breach History

A+
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

A
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A (Top 10%)
🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 16, 2026 at 06:16 AM

Assessment Transparency

See exactly what data backs this security assessment

Data Coverage

4/8 security categories assessed

50%
complete
Identity & Access
Available
Compliance
Available
API Security
Available
Infrastructure
Available
Data Protection
Missing
Vulnerability Mgmt
Missing
Incident Response
Missing
Breach History
Missing

Score based on 4 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.

Evaluation Friction

HIGH
Estimated: 4+ weeks
0% public documentation accessibility

Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.

13 data sources successful

Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility

Comprehensive Security Analysis

In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations

Security Analysis

Executive Summary

MetricValueAssessment
Security GradeD+Needs Improvement
Risk LevelHighNot recommended
Enterprise Readiness45%Gaps Exist
Critical Gaps0None

Security Assessment

CategoryScoreStatusAction Required
🟢 Breach History100/100excellentMaintain current controls
🟡 Vulnerability Management85/100goodMaintain current controls
🟡 Compliance & Certification70/100goodMonitor and improve gradually
🟠 Incident Response60/100needs_improvementMonitor and improve gradually
🟠 API Security50/100needs_improvementAdd rate limiting and authentication
🟠 Data Protection30/100needs_improvementImplement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more
🟠 Identity & Access Management25/100needs_improvementURGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately
🟠 Infrastructure Security20/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls

Overall Grade: D+ (38/100)

Critical Security Gaps

GapSeverityBusiness ImpactRecommendation
🟡 No public security documentation or audit reportsMEDIUM40-80 hours of security assessment overheadRequest security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper

Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0

Compliance Status

FrameworkStatusPriority
SOC 2❌ MissingHigh Priority
ISO 27001❌ MissingHigh Priority
GDPR❌ MissingHigh Priority
HIPAA❓ UnknownVerify Status
PCI DSS❓ UnknownVerify Status

Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.

Operational Excellence

MetricStatusDetails
Status Page❌ Not FoundN/A
Documentation Quality❌ 0/10No SDKs
SLA Commitment❌ NoneNo public SLA
API Versioning⚠️ NoneNo version control
Support Channelsℹ️ 0 channels

Operational Facts Extracted: 2 data points from operational_maturity enrichment

Integration Requirements

AspectDetailsNotes
Setup Time3-5 days (manual setup required)Estimated deployment timeline
Known IssuesManual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls neededImplementation considerations

⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration

Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:

  • Employee personal information (SSN, address, contact details)
  • Compensation data (salaries, bonuses, equity grants)
  • Performance reviews and disciplinary records

Risk Level: CRITICAL - Contains personally identifiable information (PII) and financial data

Compliance Requirements:

  • GDPR - General Data Protection Regulation (EU)
  • CCPA - California Consumer Privacy Act (US)
  • SOX - Sarbanes-Oxley Act (financial reporting)
  • PCI DSS - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard
  • SOC 2 Type II - Security, Availability, Processing Integrity

Compliance & Certifications

1
Active
0
Pending
5
Not Certified

API Intelligence

Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for VidCruiter.

API Intelligence

Incomplete

API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.

Incomplete API Intelligence

Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.

View Vendor Documentation

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

CISO

VidCruiter demonstrates moderately strong security practices for a video recruitment platform, earning a B grade (70/100) with solid identity and access management capabilities. However, significant data gaps in core security dimensions require investigation before enterprise deployment.

Critical Security Assessment

The platform's primary strength lies in its identity and access management framework, scoring 70/100, which indicates robust authentication controls and user provisioning capabilities essential for HR systems handling sensitive candidate data. This suggests proper access governance for recruiting teams and hiring managers across enterprise organizations.

However, substantial concerns emerge from missing security assessments across critical dimensions. The absence of encryption and data protection scores raises questions about data-at-rest and data-in-transit protections for video recordings and personally identifiable information. For a platform processing candidate videos and personal data, encryption capabilities are non-negotiable enterprise requirements.

Compliance posture presents significant gaps with no SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, or HIPAA certifications documented. Enterprise procurement typically mandates SOC 2 Type II as baseline assurance for SaaS vendors, particularly those handling HR data across multiple jurisdictions. The lack of documented compliance frameworks creates potential regulatory exposure.

Application security, infrastructure protections, and vendor risk management capabilities remain unassessed, creating blind spots in the overall security evaluation. Without visibility into vulnerability management, secure development practices, and third-party risk controls, comprehensive risk assessment becomes challenging.

CISO Recommendation

Conditional approval requiring enhanced security due diligence. Mandate completion of security questionnaire covering encryption standards, compliance certifications, and application security controls before production deployment. Implement enhanced monitoring and require SOC 2 Type II certification within 12 months. Consider this platform acceptable risk only with compensating controls including data loss prevention monitoring and enhanced access logging for all video recruitment activities.

AI-Powered Analysis
Claude Sonnet 41,086 wordsZero fabrication

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of VidCruiter's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Data Not Yet Assessed

We haven't collected operational maturity data for VidCruiter yet.

🤖

Security Automation APIs

Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about VidCruiter

VidCruiter's security posture reveals significant vulnerabilities with an overall security score of 33/100, earning a D grade on the SaaSPosture security assessment. The most critical areas of concern include complete absence of API security and data protection mechanisms, which represent substantial potential risks for enterprise deployments. Identity and Access Management scores just 29/100, indicating weak user authentication and access control protocols. While the platform demonstrates moderate performance in compliance and infrastructure security (scoring 60 and 56 respectively), these dimensions still require substantial improvement. The vulnerability management score of 68 offers a slight positive note, and the breach history score of 80 suggests minimal past security incidents. Security leaders should conduct thorough due diligence before integrating VidCruiter into sensitive workflows. For a comprehensive security dimension breakdown, review the detailed Security Dimensions section on this application's profile.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

VidCruiter scores 33/100, receiving a D grade in our comprehensive security assessment, indicating significant security improvement opportunities. The platform demonstrates moderate performance in Compliance & Certification (60/100) and Infrastructure Security (56/100), with Vulnerability Management showing a stronger 68/100 score. However, critical security dimensions like API Security and Data Protection register zero scores, signaling substantial security gaps. Identity & Access Management, a crucial security layer, scores only 29/100, highlighting potential risks in user authentication and system access controls. While the Breach History dimension shows a strong 80/100, suggesting limited past security incidents, the overall low score demands immediate security enhancement. Security decision-makers should carefully evaluate VidCruiter's security posture, paying special attention to API integration, data protection protocols, and access management strategies. See the Security Dimensions section for a detailed breakdown of each assessment category.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

VidCruiter demonstrates significant security vulnerabilities when handling financial data, with an overall security score of 33/100 and a "D" grade. The platform's Identity and Access Management score of 29/100 indicates substantial risk, particularly for sensitive financial information. While the platform shows moderate performance in Compliance (60/100) and Infrastructure Security (56/100), critical gaps exist in API Security and Data Protection, both scoring 0/100. The only relatively strong dimension is Breach History at 80/100, suggesting limited historical security incidents. Financial professionals should exercise extreme caution and implement additional security controls if using VidCruiter for payment-related processes. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive security breakdown, and consider implementing robust third-party financial data monitoring when utilizing this platform. For detailed security recommendations, contact VidCruiter's security team directly.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

VidCruiter's infrastructure security presents significant challenges, with an overall security score of 33/100, earning a "D" grade. Critical security dimensions reveal systemic weaknesses, particularly in API Security and Data Protection, which both score 0/100. Identity & Access Management represents the most substantial concern, scoring just 29/100 and indicating substantial authentication and access control risks. While Vulnerability Management demonstrates a slightly more robust 68/100 score and Breach History maintains an 80/100 rating, these isolated strengths cannot compensate for widespread security gaps. Infrastructure Security achieves a modest 56/100, suggesting fundamental protection mechanisms are partially implemented but far from comprehensive. Compliance & Certification scores 60/100, reflecting minimal regulatory adherence. Security decision-makers should conduct thorough due diligence and potentially implement additional compensating controls. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of VidCruiter's infrastructure security posture.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

VidCruiter presents significant security risks that make enterprise-level approval challenging. With a low security score of 33/100 and a grade of D, the platform lacks critical enterprise compliance standards including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS certifications. Security decision-makers should carefully evaluate these substantial compliance gaps before considering VidCruiter for sensitive organizational data.

The platform's security profile suggests potential vulnerabilities that could expose organizations to data protection and regulatory risks. While VidCruiter may offer recruitment functionality, its security posture does not meet typical enterprise risk management requirements. Organizations processing sensitive candidate information, particularly in healthcare, finance, or regulated industries, should seek alternative solutions with robust security frameworks.

For a comprehensive security assessment, review the full Security Dimensions section on the application's detailed profile, which provides in-depth analysis of its security infrastructure.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Compare with Alternatives

How does VidCruiter stack up against similar applications in HR & Talent Management? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application
Score
Grade
AI 🤖
Action
48🏆
C+N/AView
44
CN/AView
39
D+N/AView
VidCruiterCurrent
38
D+N/A
33
DN/AView
30
DN/AView
26
FN/AView
💡

Security Comparison Insight

8 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.