Handwrytten

CFO

From a financial perspective, Handwrytten presents acceptable business risk with strong identity and access management controls, though significant data gaps require heightened vendor oversight during procurement.

Business Risk Analysis

The platform demonstrates strong foundational security with an 85/100 identity and access management score, indicating robust user authentication and authorization controls that reduce operational disruption risks. This strength suggests lower likelihood of account compromises that could impact business continuity or require costly incident response.

However, substantial visibility gaps across critical security dimensions create elevated procurement complexity. The absence of compliance certifications like SOC 2 or ISO 27001 may complicate vendor due diligence processes and potentially require additional audit resources during onboarding. Without established compliance frameworks, our internal audit team will need to conduct more extensive vendor assessments, increasing procurement timelines and administrative overhead.

The lack of visible data protection and infrastructure security assessments raises questions about operational resilience and disaster recovery capabilities. While no breach history is documented, the limited security visibility across encryption, network security, and application protection could expose our organization to unexpected operational interruptions or compliance audit findings.

From a vendor stability perspective, the unknown company size and funding status prevents proper assessment of long-term viability and service continuity risk. This uncertainty could impact contract negotiations and require additional service level guarantees or escrow arrangements.

CFO Recommendation

Recommend conditional approval requiring enhanced vendor security questionnaire completion, third-party security audit validation, and comprehensive service level agreements with operational continuity guarantees. Procurement should negotiate additional compliance documentation and establish quarterly security review requirements to address visibility gaps before contract execution.

CTO/Developer

From a technical integration perspective, Handwrytten demonstrates solid foundational security posture with an 85/100 overall score, though significant data gaps limit comprehensive architectural assessment.

The platform's identity and access management capabilities score strongly at 85/100, indicating robust authentication frameworks that should integrate well with enterprise SSO systems and OAuth 2.0 implementations. This suggests their API authentication layer follows modern security standards, reducing integration friction for development teams. However, the absence of data on encryption protocols, application security architecture, and API-specific security controls creates uncertainty around data protection during transmission and storage operations.

The lack of formal compliance certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001) presents a notable integration risk, particularly for enterprise environments requiring documented security controls and third-party attestations. While the company maintains a clean breach history, the missing infrastructure and network security assessments make it difficult to evaluate the platform's resilience under enterprise-scale traffic loads and security monitoring requirements.

From a developer experience perspective, the integration assessment is hampered by insufficient visibility into API design quality, SDK availability, and documentation standards. The " Contact for pricing" model suggests custom integration approaches rather than standardized developer tooling, which could increase implementation complexity and ongoing maintenance overhead for engineering teams.

The complete absence of threat intelligence and vendor risk management data raises concerns about the platform's security monitoring capabilities and incident response procedures. Enterprise integrations typically require real-time security event visibility and standardized alerting mechanisms.

Conditional approval with enhanced due diligence required. Recommend proceeding with a limited pilot integration while conducting additional technical security reviews focused on API documentation, encryption standards, and compliance roadmap. Implement enhanced logging and monitoring during initial deployment to compensate for visibility gaps in their security architecture.

Legal/Compliance

From a legal and compliance perspective, this platform presents significant regulatory risk due to the absence of fundamental compliance certifications and data protection frameworks that are standard enterprise requirements.

Compliance Risk Analysis

The most concerning aspect from a legal standpoint is the complete absence of SOC 2 Type II certification, which represents a critical gap for any vendor processing enterprise data. SOC 2 compliance demonstrates adherence to Trust Services Criteria for security, availability, and confidentiality - requirements that most enterprise Data Processing Agreements mandate as minimum standards. Without this certification, the organization assumes elevated liability exposure for potential data incidents.

The lack of GDPR compliance framework creates substantial regulatory risk for any processing of EU personal data. Article 28 of GDPR requires data controllers to use only processors that provide sufficient guarantees of appropriate technical and organizational measures. The absence of documented GDPR compliance measures could expose the organization to regulatory penalties up to 4% of global annual revenue under Article 83.

The platform's strong identity and access management controls (85/100) provide some mitigation for unauthorized access risks, which supports contractual data security obligations. However, the complete absence of data protection and privacy framework scores indicates insufficient safeguards for meeting regulatory data handling requirements under frameworks like CCPA, PIPEDA, or sector-specific regulations.

The lack of security certifications also complicates cyber insurance coverage, as many policies require vendors to maintain industry-standard compliance certifications. This creates potential coverage gaps for data breach incidents.

Legal Recommendation

Not recommended for enterprise deployment. The absence of fundamental compliance certifications creates unacceptable regulatory risk that exceeds standard enterprise liability thresholds. Any engagement would require comprehensive third-party security audit, enhanced contractual indemnification, and vendor commitment to achieve SOC 2 Type II certification within 90 days.