Esper Security Assessment
Other Business Software
The Leading MDM Purpose-Built for Dedicated Devices Take full control of your Android, iOS and Linux POS systems, digital kiosks, and more with tools designed to tackle the challenges of compliance, drift, and scale — securely, effortlessly, and without compromise.
9-Dimension Security Framework
Identity & Access Management
Compliance & Certification
AI Integration Security
NEWAPI Security
Infrastructure Security
Data Protection
Vulnerability Management
Breach History
Incident Response
AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)
Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.
Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 07:47 PM
Assessment Transparency
See exactly what data backs this security assessment
Data Coverage
4/8 security categories assessed
Score based on 4 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.
Evaluation Friction
Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.
Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility
AI Integration Security
🔒 9th DimensionAssess whether Esper is safe for AI agent integration. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards.
AI Readiness
Infrastructure for AI integration
AI Security
Safety controls for AI agents
Essential Security Analysis
Based on available security assessment data
Compliance & Certifications
AI Integration Security Assessment
Industry-first assessment evaluating whether Esper is safe and ready for AI agent integration. Covers AI security controls and readiness infrastructure for Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP).
AI Integration Security
Industry-first assessment for AI agent safety
✅Excellent Security Features
- ●Comprehensive API coverage for device management operations
- ●Event feed/audit logging endpoints exist for device and group activities
- ●SDK provides granular permission management at device level (USB, runtime permissions)
⚠️Security Gaps & Recommendations
- ●No oauth scopes
- ●No token expiration
- ●No service accounts
- ●No mfa enforcement
- ●No pii redaction
- ●No training opt out
- ●No data residency
- ●No gdpr compliance
- ●No read only tokens
- ●No ai attribution
AI Integration Security evaluates whether Esper is safe for AI agent access. This assessment considers authentication strength, access controls, observability capabilities, and data privacy protections when APIs are accessed by AI systems like Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, or custom AI agents.
AI Readiness Assessment
Evaluates readiness for AI agent integration
Official or community MCP server support
API docs, SDKs, code examples
API reference, auth flows, error handling
MCP Server Available
communityEsper supports Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) for secure AI agent integration.
View MCP Server💡Recommendations
- →⚠️ Official MCP server not found. Best alternative: https://github.com/Esperk/pydantic-ai-logfire-demo (Trust: 0/100)
- →⚠️ 🔴 High Risk: Repository appears abandoned, No license found
- →❌ Poor AI readiness - not recommended for AI workflows
AI Readiness measures whether Esperprovides the infrastructure and developer resources necessary for secure AI agent integration. High readiness indicates official MCP server support, comprehensive API documentation, and developer-friendly tools.
API Intelligence
Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Esper.
API Intelligence
API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.
Incomplete API Intelligence
Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.
View Vendor DocumentationAI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis
LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.
Security Posture & Operational Capabilities
Comprehensive assessment of Esper's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.
Operational Data Not Yet Assessed
We haven't collected operational maturity data for Esper yet.
Security Automation APIs
Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls
Compare with Alternatives
How does Esper stack up against similar applications in Other Business Software? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.
| Application | Overall ScoreScore↓ | Grade | AI Security 🤖AI 🤖⇅ | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EsperCurrent | 52/100🏆 | B | 30.2/100 | |
48/100 | C+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
47/100 | C+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
41/100 | C | N/A | View ProfileView | |
38/100 | D+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
27/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
25/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView |
Security Comparison Insight
2 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.