Skip to main content
Docebo Inc. logo

Docebo Inc. Security Assessment

HR & Talent Management

Docebo makes employee, partner and customer training easy and engaging while saving L&D admins countless hours with artificial intelligence.

Data: 5/8(63%)
HIGH Friction
SECURITY VERIFIED • SAASPOSTURE • JAN 2026
D
Bottom 30%
Docebo Inc. logoDocebo Inc.
SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .
33
Overall Score
Weighted average across all dimensions
D
Security Grade
Below Avg
65% confidence

Identity & Access Management

D+
Score:0
Weight:33%
Grade:D+ (Below Avg)

Compliance & Certification

F
Score:0
Weight:19%
Grade:F (Critical)

AI Integration Security

NEW
D
Score:0
Weight:12%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

API Security

B
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:B (Top 25%)

Infrastructure Security

F
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:F (Critical)

Data Protection

C
Score:0
Weight:10%
Grade:C (Top 50%)

Vulnerability Management

A+
Score:0
Weight:3%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Breach History

A+
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

A
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A (Top 10%)
🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 16, 2026 at 07:07 AM

Assessment Transparency

See exactly what data backs this security assessment

Data Coverage

5/8 security categories assessed

63%
complete
Identity & Access
Available
Compliance
Available
API Security
Available
Infrastructure
Available
Data Protection
Missing
Vulnerability Mgmt
Available
Incident Response
Missing
Breach History
Missing

Score based on 5 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.

Evaluation Friction

HIGH
Estimated: 4+ weeks
0% public documentation accessibility

Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.

18 data sources successful

Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility

🤖

AI Integration Security

🔒 9th Dimension

Assess whether Docebo Inc. is safe for AI agent integration. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards.

🔌

AI Readiness

Infrastructure for AI integration

F
21/100
MCP Available
🔌 MCP Server0/100
👨‍💻 Developer Experience0/100
📚 Documentation70/100
Top Recommendation:
❌ Poor AI readiness - not recommended for AI workflows
🛡️

AI Security

Safety controls for AI agents

D
33.5/100
HIGH_RISK
🔐 Authentication40%
🔒 Access Control35%
👁️ Observability55%
🔏 Data Privacy15%
✅ Excellent Security:
Basic audit logging available with API call tracking
⚠️ Needs Attention:
No oauth scopes
🛡️Unique Assessment: Evaluating AI agent integration safety helps you make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors

Comprehensive Security Analysis

In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations

Security Analysis

Executive Summary

MetricValueAssessment
Security GradeDNeeds Improvement
Risk LevelHighNot recommended
Enterprise Readiness43%Gaps Exist
Critical Gaps0None

Security Assessment

CategoryScoreStatusAction Required
🟢 Breach History100/100excellentMaintain current controls
🟡 Vulnerability Management85/100goodMaintain current controls
🟠 Incident Response60/100needs_improvementMonitor and improve gradually
🟠 API Security50/100needs_improvementAdd rate limiting and authentication
🟠 Data Protection40/100needs_improvementImplement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more
🟠 Identity & Access Management35/100needs_improvementURGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately
🟠 Infrastructure Security20/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 Compliance & Certification10/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls

Overall Grade: D (33/100)

Critical Security Gaps

GapSeverityBusiness ImpactRecommendation
🟢 No dedicated security documentation pageLOWExtended due diligence processRequest security whitepaper or public audit reports

Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0

Compliance Status

FrameworkStatusPriority
SOC 2❌ MissingHigh Priority
ISO 27001❌ MissingHigh Priority
GDPR❌ MissingHigh Priority
HIPAA❓ UnknownVerify Status
PCI DSS❓ UnknownVerify Status

Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.

Operational Excellence

MetricStatusDetails
Status Page❌ Not FoundN/A
Documentation Quality✅ 8/10No SDKs
SLA Commitment✅ PublishedFormal SLA available
API Versioning✅ YesBreaking changes managed
Support Channelsℹ️ 0 channels

Operational Facts Extracted: 5 data points from operational_maturity enrichment

Integration Requirements

AspectDetailsNotes
Setup Time3-5 days (manual setup required)Estimated deployment timeline
Known IssuesManual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls neededImplementation considerations

⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration

Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:

  • Employee personal information (SSN, address, contact details)
  • Compensation data (salaries, bonuses, equity grants)
  • Performance reviews and disciplinary records

Risk Level: CRITICAL - Contains personally identifiable information (PII) and financial data

Compliance Requirements:

  • GDPR - General Data Protection Regulation (EU)
  • CCPA - California Consumer Privacy Act (US)
  • SOX - Sarbanes-Oxley Act (financial reporting)
  • PCI DSS - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard
  • SOC 2 Type II - Security, Availability, Processing Integrity

Compliance & Certifications

0
Active
0
Pending
6
Not Certified

AI Integration Security Assessment

Industry-first assessment evaluating whether Docebo Inc. is safe and ready for AI agent integration. Covers AI security controls and readiness infrastructure for Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP).

AI Integration Security

Industry-first assessment for AI agent safety

D
GRADE
Below Avg
33.5
AI Security Score
🔐Authentication
40
🛡️Access Control
35
👁️Observability
55
🔒Data Privacy
15
📊Confidence Score
86%
HIGH_RISK

Excellent Security Features

  • Basic audit logging available with API call tracking
  • JWT token support for authentication (up to 2 week validity)
  • Power User permission system exists (though scope unclear)

⚠️Security Gaps & Recommendations

  • No oauth scopes
  • No service accounts
  • No mfa enforcement
  • No pii redaction
  • No training opt out
  • No data residency
  • No read only tokens
  • No action restrictions
  • No ai attribution
  • No rate limiting
ℹ️

AI Integration Security evaluates whether Docebo Inc. is safe for AI agent access. This assessment considers authentication strength, access controls, observability capabilities, and data privacy protections when APIs are accessed by AI systems like Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, or custom AI agents.

AI Readiness Assessment

Evaluates readiness for AI agent integration

F
GRADE
Critical
21.0
AI Readiness Score
🔌
MCP Server Availability(40% weight)

Official or community MCP server support

0
👨‍💻
Developer Experience(30% weight)

API docs, SDKs, code examples

0
📚
Documentation Quality(30% weight)

API reference, auth flows, error handling

70

MCP Server Available

community

Docebo Inc. supports Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) for secure AI agent integration.

💡Recommendations

  • ❌ Poor AI readiness - not recommended for AI workflows
📊Confidence Score
70%
🕐Last Verified
1/7/2026
ℹ️

AI Readiness measures whether Docebo Inc.provides the infrastructure and developer resources necessary for secure AI agent integration. High readiness indicates official MCP server support, comprehensive API documentation, and developer-friendly tools.

API Intelligence

Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Docebo Inc..

API Intelligence

Incomplete

API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.

Incomplete API Intelligence

Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.

View Vendor Documentation

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of Docebo Inc.'s security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Maturity

Support, SLAs, and documentation quality

Documentation Quality

80% • Excellent
🤖

Security Automation APIs

Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Docebo Inc.

The software is available in three different pricing plans: Engage (starting from $25,000/year), Elevate (starting from $40,000/year), and Enterprise (custom pricing). Contact us for a custom Docebo c

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

This is supported for Android tablets with an 8” screen or larger and Apple iPads of all sizes. On the mobile browser, you can access both administrator and learner views of the platform, however, onl

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Answer coming soon. Check back later for updates.

Docebo offers a cloud-based AI-powered learning platform designed to manage and deliver personalized learning experiences across various audiences and industries.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Compare with Alternatives

How does Docebo Inc. stack up against similar applications in HR & Talent Management? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application
Score
Grade
AI 🤖
Action
48🏆
C+N/AView
44
CN/AView
39
D+N/AView
33
D33.5
33
DN/AView
30
DN/AView
26
FN/AView
💡

Security Comparison Insight

11 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.

Research Sources

38 citations for Docebo Inc.

91%Quality

Data from static JSON · Last enriched: October 9, 2025