Contentsquare Security Assessment
Marketing & Advertising
Contentsquare’s Digital Experience Analytics Cloud enables Marketing, eCommerce, Operations, Analytics, and Product teams to understand what makes their customers click so they can prioritize the right actions for creating better web and app experiences that drive more revenue.
9-Dimension Security Framework
Identity & Access Management
Compliance & Certification
AI Integration Security
NEWAPI Security
Infrastructure Security
Data Protection
Vulnerability Management
Breach History
Incident Response
AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)
Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.
Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 08:46 AM
Assessment Transparency
See exactly what data backs this security assessment
Data Coverage
3/8 security categories assessed
Score based on 3 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.
Evaluation Friction
Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.
Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility
Essential Security Analysis
Based on available security assessment data
Compliance & Certifications
API Intelligence
Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Contentsquare.
API Intelligence
API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.
Incomplete API Intelligence
Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.
View Vendor DocumentationAI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis
LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.
CISO
This platform shows good security maturity with some areas requiring targeted enhancement. The B-grade security posture (71/100) reflects solid identity and access management foundations, though comprehensive assessment coverage needs expansion.
Key Security Findings
The strongest security capability lies in identity and access management, demonstrating mature authentication controls with an 80/100 assessment. This indicates robust user provisioning, session management, and access control mechanisms that meet enterprise standards for user identity governance.
However, a critical concern emerges from incomplete security assessment coverage across multiple domains. The platform lacks evaluated encryption and data protection capabilities, compliance framework implementation, and infrastructure security controls. This assessment gap creates blind spots in our risk evaluation, particularly concerning data-at-rest protection, network security hardening, and regulatory compliance posture.
The absence of documented security certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR compliance frameworks) represents a significant vendor risk management challenge. Enterprise customers typically require formal attestations for compliance validation and third-party risk assessments. Without these certifications, additional due diligence through security questionnaires, penetration testing reports, and compliance documentation becomes necessary.
Breach intelligence shows no documented security incidents, which suggests either effective security controls or limited threat exposure visibility. Given the incomplete security assessment scope, this finding requires verification through vendor security documentation and incident response capability evaluation.
The platform's contact-based pricing model indicates enterprise positioning but provides no transparency into security investment levels or dedicated security resources allocation.
CISO Recommendation
Conditional approval requiring enhanced security validation. Deploy with compensating controls including detailed vendor security questionnaire completion, third-party security assessment results review, and documented data handling agreements. Implement enhanced monitoring during initial deployment phases until comprehensive security coverage can be established.
Security Posture & Operational Capabilities
Comprehensive assessment of Contentsquare's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.
Operational Data Not Yet Assessed
We haven't collected operational maturity data for Contentsquare yet.
Security Automation APIs
Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Contentsquare
Contentsquare's security posture reveals a C-grade overall security assessment with a score of 40/100, indicating significant room for improvement across multiple security dimensions. The platform demonstrates strengths in data protection and vulnerability management, scoring 85/100 in these critical areas, with a perfect 100/100 breach history. However, key security domains like Identity & Access Management, API Security, and Compliance & Certification score between 30-35/100, signaling substantial security enhancement opportunities. Infrastructure Security performs slightly better at 50/100. While the company shows robust performance in vulnerability management and data protection, security decision-makers should carefully evaluate the platform's identity management, compliance frameworks, and API security protocols. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of Contentsquare's security assessment and potential improvement strategies.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Contentsquare's security assessment reveals a C-grade performance with an overall security score of 40/100, indicating significant room for improvement across multiple security dimensions. The platform demonstrates strong capabilities in Data Protection and Vulnerability Management, scoring 85/100 in both areas, with a perfect 100/100 in Breach History. However, critical security domains like Identity & Access Management, Compliance & Certification, and API Security score poorly at 30/100, suggesting substantial security gaps. Infrastructure Security performs marginally better at 50/100, while Incident Response achieves a moderate 60/100. The most pressing concerns lie in access management and compliance frameworks, which need immediate strategic enhancements. Security decision-makers should prioritize strengthening identity controls and certification processes. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of Contentsquare's security posture and targeted improvement recommendations.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Contentsquare's security posture presents mixed risks for financial data management. With an overall security score of 40/100, the platform receives a C grade, indicating significant areas needing improvement. Critical security dimensions like Identity & Access Management and API Security score only 30/100, suggesting potential vulnerabilities in access controls and integration security. While the Data Protection dimension demonstrates strength at 85/100, other key areas like Compliance & Certification remain weak at 35/100. Infrastructure Security provides moderate protection at 50/100. Financial organizations should conduct thorough due diligence before transferring sensitive data. Positive notes include an unblemished breach history and robust Vulnerability Management scoring 85/100. Security decision-makers should carefully review the detailed Security Dimensions section, paying close attention to access management and compliance protocols before integrating Contentsquare into financial workflows.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Contentsquare's infrastructure security presents a mixed security profile with an overall security score of 40/100, earning a C grade. The platform demonstrates notable strengths in data protection and vulnerability management, achieving strong scores of 85/100 in both dimensions. However, critical security areas like identity and access management, API security, and compliance require significant improvement. Infrastructure security scores 50/100, indicating moderate foundational security controls. The platform's most impressive attribute is a perfect 100/100 breach history score, suggesting no documented past security incidents. While vulnerability management remains robust, the company needs substantial enhancements in access controls, API protection, and compliance frameworks. Security-conscious organizations should carefully evaluate Contentsquare's infrastructure, focusing on identity management and compliance gaps. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of each security domain's performance.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Contentsquare's overall security score of 40/100 raises significant enterprise risk concerns. With a "C" grade and multiple critical compliance gaps including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS certifications missing, organizations should exercise extreme caution before deployment. Enterprise security teams must conduct a thorough risk assessment to understand potential vulnerabilities. The low security rating suggests substantial potential exposure to data protection and regulatory compliance challenges. For sensitive business environments, this security profile may require substantial additional safeguards or alternative vendor selection. Security decision-makers should request a comprehensive security review directly from Contentsquare, focusing on their specific compliance and data protection requirements. See Security Dimensions section for a detailed breakdown of specific risk factors and recommended mitigation strategies before considering enterprise-wide implementation.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Compare with Alternatives
How does Contentsquare stack up against similar applications in Marketing & Advertising? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.
| Application | Overall ScoreScore↓ | Grade | AI Security 🤖AI 🤖⇅ | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
45/100🏆 | C+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
44/100 | C | N/A | View ProfileView | |
ContentsquareCurrent | 40/100 | C | N/A | |
35/100 | D+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
28/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
25/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
23/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView |
Security Comparison Insight
7 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.