Collibra

CFO

From a financial perspective, Collibra presents unacceptable business risk that could significantly impact our operational continuity and compliance posture. The platform's poor security assessment raises serious concerns about our ability to maintain regulatory compliance and protect enterprise data assets.

The most critical business risk is the lack of fundamental compliance certifications. Without SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, or GDPR compliance documentation, we face substantial regulatory exposure across multiple jurisdictions. Our audit teams would need to perform extensive compensating controls assessments, dramatically increasing compliance costs and audit complexity. The absence of these baseline certifications suggests immature governance processes that could impact service reliability and vendor accountability.

Equally concerning is the limited security framework implementation across core protection areas. Data encryption capabilities, application security controls, and threat monitoring appear underdeveloped, creating operational risks that could disrupt business continuity. Any security incident involving Collibra could trigger mandatory breach notifications, regulatory investigations, and potential customer data exposure - all carrying significant operational and reputational costs.

The vendor's infrastructure and network security posture presents additional procurement challenges. Our due diligence process would require extensive third-party security assessments, legal review of liability frameworks, and implementation of enhanced monitoring controls. These requirements would substantially increase procurement timeline and ongoing vendor management overhead.

From a vendor risk management perspective, the limited security transparency makes it difficult to establish appropriate service level agreements and liability frameworks. Our legal teams would need to negotiate enhanced indemnification clauses and incident response requirements, adding complexity to contract negotiations.

Do not recommend proceeding with Collibra procurement. The substantial security gaps create unacceptable business risk that could impact regulatory compliance, operational continuity, and enterprise data protection. Recommend identifying alternative vendors with mature security frameworks and established compliance certifications that align with our enterprise risk tolerance.

CTO/Developer

From a technical integration perspective, this platform presents significant integration risks with poor API security and fundamentally inadequate security architecture. The overall security posture indicates serious deficiencies that would introduce unacceptable technical debt into our enterprise infrastructure.

Technical Assessment

The platform exhibits critical gaps across multiple security dimensions that directly impact integration safety. With virtually no visibility into encryption standards, data protection mechanisms, or API security controls, integrating this solution would expose our infrastructure to substantial risk. The absence of modern authentication frameworks and secure communication protocols creates potential vulnerabilities in data exchange patterns.

Most concerning from an architectural standpoint is the complete lack of compliance framework adherence. Without SOC 2 Type II certification or ISO 27001 compliance, this platform has likely not undergone rigorous security auditing of its API endpoints, data handling procedures, or infrastructure controls. This suggests potential weaknesses in rate limiting, input validation, and secure session management that could cascade into our systems.

The vendor's security posture indicates insufficient investment in developer security tooling, API documentation standards, and integration best practices. This translates to increased development time, ongoing maintenance overhead, and potential security incidents requiring immediate remediation. Integration would likely require extensive custom security wrappers, enhanced monitoring infrastructure, and frequent security assessments.

Without established security frameworks, API versioning strategies, or clear security documentation, this platform would create significant technical debt. Our engineering teams would spend substantial time compensating for missing security controls rather than focusing on business value delivery.

CTO Recommendation

Not recommended for integration. This platform would introduce unacceptable technical debt and security vulnerabilities into our enterprise architecture. The absence of fundamental security controls makes this unsuitable for production deployment in our regulated environment.

Legal/Compliance

From a legal and compliance perspective, this platform presents unacceptable compliance risk that could expose the organization to regulatory penalties and operational liability. The absence of fundamental regulatory certifications creates significant contractual and audit vulnerabilities that exceed prudent risk thresholds.

The platform lacks essential compliance foundations including SOC 2 Type II certification, which is typically required for enterprise vendor agreements and demonstrates inadequate internal controls over financial reporting and security operations. Without ISO 27001 certification, there are insufficient information security management systems to meet regulatory requirements under frameworks like GDPR Article 32, which mandates appropriate technical and organizational measures. The absence of GDPR compliance indicators is particularly concerning given the extraterritorial reach of European data protection law and potential fines up to 4% of global revenue for non-compliant data processors.

The minimal security assessment across critical dimensions raises questions about the vendor's ability to fulfill data processor obligations under various regulatory frameworks. Without documented encryption protocols, access controls, and incident response procedures, the organization faces potential liability for inadequate third-party due diligence under regulations like CCPA, HIPAA (if applicable), and state breach notification laws. The lack of compliance certifications also complicates audit requirements and may trigger additional regulatory scrutiny during examinations.

From a contractual perspective, the vendor's compliance posture would require extensive additional warranties, indemnification clauses, and audit rights that may not be commercially feasible. The organization would need to implement compensating controls and enhanced monitoring to address regulatory gaps, potentially exceeding the platform's operational value.

Not recommended - compliance risk exceeds acceptable threshold for enterprise deployment without substantial remediation of fundamental regulatory deficiencies.