BunnyCDN Security Assessment

CFO

From a financial perspective, bunny.net presents good business risk with standard due diligence requirements. The platform demonstrates solid identity and access management capabilities, though significant data gaps require closer scrutiny before finalizing procurement decisions.

The primary business concern centers on incomplete security documentation across critical operational areas. While the vendor shows no breach history, the absence of fundamental compliance certifications creates potential regulatory exposure. For a 5,000-employee enterprise, this gap could complicate audit processes and increase compliance management overhead. The lack of SOC 2 Type II certification is particularly problematic, as this standard has become baseline expectation for enterprise vendor relationships.

Operational continuity presents mixed signals. The strong identity management foundation suggests mature access controls that reduce insider threat risks and support clean offboarding processes. However, the limited visibility into data protection protocols creates uncertainty around business continuity planning and incident response capabilities. This knowledge gap could delay crisis management if security incidents occur.

Procurement efficiency faces moderate challenges. The " contact for pricing" model indicates potential complexity in contract negotiations, while the absence of established competitor benchmarking data limits our negotiation leverage. The unknown company financial profile introduces vendor stability questions that our vendor management team must address through enhanced due diligence.

The platform's focused security investment in access controls suggests a vendor that prioritizes user management over comprehensive security frameworks. This approach may align with specific use cases but creates broader risk management challenges for enterprise deployment.

Recommendation: Approve with enhanced vendor monitoring including quarterly security posture reviews and formal commitment to SOC 2 certification within 12 months. Require detailed security architecture documentation and established breach notification procedures before contract execution. Implement compensating controls for compliance gaps during initial deployment phase.

CTO/Developer

From a technical integration perspective, bunny.net's CDN platform demonstrates good integration capabilities with standard developer tooling, though evaluation is constrained by limited security assessment coverage spanning only identity and access controls.

The platform's identity and access management achieves a solid 70/100 score, indicating well-implemented API authentication and authorization frameworks essential for secure enterprise integration. This suggests competent OAuth or API key management systems that should integrate cleanly with existing enterprise identity providers. However, the absence of encryption and data protection assessments raises concerns about data-in-transitsecurity during API communications and potential vulnerabilities in data handling pipelines.

The lack of compliance certifications presents significant integration complexity for regulated environments. Without SOC 2 Type II attestation, our compliance team will require additional vendor assessment procedures, extending integration timelines and potentially blocking deployment in regulated business units. The absence of infrastructure and application security evaluations means we cannot assess API rate limiting, DDoS protection capabilities, or secure coding practices—all critical for production workloads.

From a developer experience perspective, CDN services typically offer straightforward REST APIs with good documentation, though the limited assessment data prevents validation of SDK quality, webhook reliability, or monitoring capabilities. The platform's focus on content delivery suggests APIs designed for high-throughput scenarios, which aligns well with our performance requirements.

Integration monitoring will require enhanced oversight given the incomplete security profile. Our DevSecOps team should implement additional API security scanning, establish custom rate limiting policies, and create fallback mechanisms for service degradation scenarios.

Conditional approval requiring comprehensive security audit before production deployment. While the available identity controls appear sound, the significant gaps in encryption, compliance, and infrastructure security necessitate additional due diligence through our vendor risk assessment process before committing to production integration.

Legal/Compliance

From a legal and compliance perspective, this platform presents significant regulatory compliance concerns that require careful evaluation and enhanced contractual protections before deployment.

Compliance Risk Analysis

The absence of industry-standard compliance certifications presents substantial regulatory exposure across multiple frameworks. Without SOC 2 Type II certification, we cannot verify adequate controls for financial data processing under Sarbanes-Oxley requirements. The lack of ISO 27001 certification raises concerns about information security management system adequacy for international operations and client data protection obligations.

GDPR compliance verification is particularly concerning given the platform's apparent lack of formal data protection certification. Under GDPR Article 28, we bear joint liability for any data processing violations by third-party processors. Without documented GDPR compliance controls, we face potential regulatory penalties of up to 4% of annual global revenue for any data protection incidents. The absence of formal data processing agreements meeting GDPR Article 28 requirements creates additional contractual liability exposure.

Healthcare and financial services compliance gaps present sector-specific risks. The lack of HIPAA certification limits deployment options for any healthcare-adjacent use cases, while missing financial services compliance frameworks could restrict integration with payment processing or financial data workflows.

The platform's limited security assessment coverage across critical dimensions suggests incomplete compliance documentation. This creates audit trail gaps that could complicate regulatory examinations and increase investigation scope during compliance reviews.

Legal Recommendation

Conditional approval requiring enhanced Data Processing Agreement with explicit GDPR Article 28 compliance warranties, annual SOC 2 reporting commitments, and expanded audit rights including third-party security assessments. Recommend limiting initial deployment to non-sensitive data processing while vendor addresses certification gaps through formal compliance roadmap with defined timelines.