Skip to main content
brightmove logo

brightmove Security Assessment

HR & Talent Management

Recruiting software, onboarding software and staffing software

Data: 7/8(88%)
HIGH Friction
SECURITY VERIFIED • SAASPOSTURE • JAN 2026
D
Bottom 30%
brightmove logobrightmove
SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .
30
Overall Score
Weighted average across all dimensions
D
Security Grade
Below Avg
65% confidence

Identity & Access Management

F
Score:0
Weight:33%
Grade:F (Critical)

Compliance & Certification

F
Score:0
Weight:19%
Grade:F (Critical)

AI Integration Security

NEW
F
Score:0
Weight:12%
Grade:F (Critical)

API Security

A
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:A (Top 10%)

Infrastructure Security

B
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:B (Top 25%)

Data Protection

F
Score:0
Weight:10%
Grade:F (Critical)

Vulnerability Management

A+
Score:0
Weight:3%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Breach History

A+
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

A
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A (Top 10%)
🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 16, 2026 at 06:54 AM

Assessment Transparency

See exactly what data backs this security assessment

Data Coverage

7/8 security categories assessed

88%
complete
Identity & Access
Available
Compliance
Available
API Security
Available
Infrastructure
Available
Data Protection
Available
Vulnerability Mgmt
Available
Incident Response
Available
Breach History
Missing

Score based on 7 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.

Evaluation Friction

HIGH
Estimated: 4+ weeks
0% public documentation accessibility

Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.

32 data sources successful

Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility

🤖

AI Integration Security

🔒 9th Dimension

Assess whether brightmove is safe for AI agent integration. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards.

🔌

AI Readiness

Infrastructure for AI integration

D
50/100
MCP Available
🔌 MCP Server50/100
👨‍💻 Developer Experience0/100
📚 Documentation100/100
Top Recommendation:
⚠️ Official MCP server not found. Best alternative: https://github.com/python-telegram-bot/python-telegram-bot/issues/2917 (Trust: 60/100)
🛡️

AI Security

Safety controls for AI agents

F
9/100
HIGH_RISK
🔐 Authentication10%
🔒 Access Control15%
👁️ Observability15%
🔏 Data Privacy0%
✅ Excellent Security:
Webhooks section documented with 'Introduction', 'Creating a Webhook', and 'Available Webhooks' in the API reference navigation.
⚠️ Needs Attention:
No oauth scopes
🛡️Unique Assessment: Evaluating AI agent integration safety helps you make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors

Comprehensive Security Analysis

In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations

Security Analysis

Executive Summary

MetricValueAssessment
Security GradeDNeeds Improvement
Risk LevelHighNot recommended
Enterprise Readiness42%Gaps Exist
Critical Gaps0None

Security Assessment

CategoryScoreStatusAction Required
🟢 Breach History100/100excellentMaintain current controls
🟡 Vulnerability Management85/100goodMaintain current controls
🟠 API Security60/100needs_improvementMonitor and improve gradually
🟠 Incident Response60/100needs_improvementMonitor and improve gradually
🟠 Infrastructure Security50/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 Identity & Access Management25/100needs_improvementURGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately
🟠 Data Protection20/100needs_improvementImplement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more
🟠 Compliance & Certification0/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls

Overall Grade: D (30/100)

Critical Security Gaps

GapSeverityBusiness ImpactRecommendation
🟢 No dedicated security documentation pageLOWExtended due diligence processRequest security whitepaper or public audit reports

Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0

Compliance Status

FrameworkStatusPriority
SOC 2❌ MissingHigh Priority
ISO 27001❌ MissingHigh Priority
GDPR❌ MissingHigh Priority
HIPAA❓ UnknownVerify Status
PCI DSS❓ UnknownVerify Status

Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.

Operational Excellence

MetricStatusDetails
Status Page✅ Availablehttps://status.brightmove.com
Documentation Quality⚠️ 7/10No SDKs
SLA Commitment✅ PublishedFormal SLA available
API Versioning✅ YesBreaking changes managed
Support Channelsℹ️ 2 channelsEmail, Chat

Operational Facts Extracted: 7 data points from operational_maturity enrichment

Integration Requirements

AspectDetailsNotes
Setup Time3-5 days (manual setup required)Estimated deployment timeline
Known IssuesManual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls neededImplementation considerations

⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration

Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:

  • Employee personal information (SSN, address, contact details)
  • Compensation data (salaries, bonuses, equity grants)
  • Performance reviews and disciplinary records

Risk Level: CRITICAL - Contains personally identifiable information (PII) and financial data

Compliance Requirements:

  • GDPR - General Data Protection Regulation (EU)
  • CCPA - California Consumer Privacy Act (US)
  • SOX - Sarbanes-Oxley Act (financial reporting)
  • PCI DSS - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard
  • SOC 2 Type II - Security, Availability, Processing Integrity

Compliance & Certifications

0
Active
0
Pending
6
Not Certified

AI Integration Security Assessment

Industry-first assessment evaluating whether brightmove is safe and ready for AI agent integration. Covers AI security controls and readiness infrastructure for Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP).

AI Integration Security

Industry-first assessment for AI agent safety

F
GRADE
Critical
9.0
AI Security Score
🔐Authentication
10
🛡️Access Control
15
👁️Observability
15
🔒Data Privacy
0
📊Confidence Score
92%
HIGH_RISK

Excellent Security Features

  • Webhooks section documented with 'Introduction', 'Creating a Webhook', and 'Available Webhooks' in the API reference navigation.
  • HTTPS enforced for all API access
  • Webhooks available for event notifications
  • User-level API keys provide some separation between accounts

⚠️Security Gaps & Recommendations

  • No oauth scopes
  • No token expiration
  • No token rotation
  • No service accounts
  • No mfa enforcement
  • No pii redaction
  • No training opt out
  • No data residency
  • No gdpr compliance
  • No read only tokens
ℹ️

AI Integration Security evaluates whether brightmove is safe for AI agent access. This assessment considers authentication strength, access controls, observability capabilities, and data privacy protections when APIs are accessed by AI systems like Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, or custom AI agents.

AI Readiness Assessment

Evaluates readiness for AI agent integration

D
GRADE
Below Avg
50.0
AI Readiness Score
🔌
MCP Server Availability(40% weight)

Official or community MCP server support

50
👨‍💻
Developer Experience(30% weight)

API docs, SDKs, code examples

0
📚
Documentation Quality(30% weight)

API reference, auth flows, error handling

100

MCP Server Available

community

brightmove supports Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) for secure AI agent integration.

View MCP Server

💡Recommendations

  • ⚠️ Official MCP server not found. Best alternative: https://github.com/python-telegram-bot/python-telegram-bot/issues/2917 (Trust: 60/100)
  • ⚠️ ⚠️ Use with caution - review code before use
  • ⚠️ Limited AI capabilities - consider alternatives
📊Confidence Score
90%
🕐Last Verified
10/15/2025
ℹ️

AI Readiness measures whether brightmoveprovides the infrastructure and developer resources necessary for secure AI agent integration. High readiness indicates official MCP server support, comprehensive API documentation, and developer-friendly tools.

API Intelligence

Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for brightmove.

API Intelligence

Incomplete

API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.

Incomplete API Intelligence

Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.

View Vendor Documentation

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of brightmove's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Maturity

Support, SLAs, and documentation quality

Support Channels

📧
Email Support
💬
Live Chat

Documentation Quality

70% • Good

Compare with Alternatives

How does brightmove stack up against similar applications in HR & Talent Management? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application
Score
Grade
AI 🤖
Action
48🏆
C+N/AView
44
CN/AView
39
D+N/AView
33
DN/AView
brightmoveCurrent
30
D9
30
DN/AView
26
FN/AView
💡

Security Comparison Insight

15 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.